Okay, I really ought to comment on Alice as it's one of the major trains.
the Rat train built excessively rapidly, and, unless Excal's even more of a bastard mod than Snow is, not everyone on that wagon is going to be Scum
Illogical noise. I see zero connection between bastard moddery and people forming an early train.
not to mention that quickhammers have occured here in the past - so I fail to see why it would necessitate Scum to have "guts" to try to cram such a thing through
Taking the stance that D1 quicklynch from L-3 actually
is a serious threat. (Universally agreed the opposite by all other players, even Zenny by that point; trying to re-start the argument?)
Anyway! Noyn is probably the main person to discuss today: I pretty much agree with Kilga here, I'm not sure it gives a nice swing alignment-wise. Also, because the opening post stated that such events "usually" only lasted one day does not mean that they universally will
Pushing Noyn speculation, AND reportering on the "OMG 2 days" thing that had already been pointed out by 2 people.
- and I'm also extremely perplexed at Laggy's behaviour: first he votes me over lurking, while complaining about the Rat train, then he backpedals stating that "oh hey maybe voting Rat to L-2 might be a good idea after all for we get useful information this way!"...um, why, how? It's Day freaking One.
Two complete misrepresentations here. Laggy complained about Zenny's overreaction to the Rat train. And when he voted for Rat, it was for the lurker reason, and it put rat at L-6 not L-2.
Alice's second post I've covered in the past; pretty weak jumping on SnowFire, and I don't know how you post two paragraphs about two sentences.
Third post:
I assumed that Scum were on the Rat jokevote train from a simple statistics argument, come on here, people, given a wagon that builds that rapidly and that easily, there is almost certainly at least one Scum on it simply because there are a nontrivial amount of Scum in the game to begin with, and it's exceedingly likely that one of them decided that hopping onto Rat was a good idea.
Purely statistically? Assuming 3 scum/13 players:
mc/Tai/Snow perspective: 42% chance.
outsider perspective: 58% chance.
Scum "exceedingly likely" decide to jump on? Even if I though jumping on was a smart scum strategy, it's WIFOM at best.
Glen's latest post is awful
Don't agree. Actually,
Glen is looking fairly good to me right now (certainly better than Laggy did) and I'm getting a little uncomfortable that last I looked at the scoreboard a Laggy/Glen lynch is looking most likely.No, I wasn't voting Snow for wishy-washiness, I was voting him for agreeing with Rat's post, then throwing its content out because of (and I quote) "meh", and then voting Rat for no appreciable reason.
When did...SnowFire EVER agree with Rat? SnowFire is pro-early-LAL (disagrees with Rat) and feels that my summary post actually has a fair bit of content (disagrees with Rat).
Lern2read. Your entire post is awful, all of your opinions read like something along the lines of "maybe X but also perhaps Y and perchance also Z really I'm not sure now come to think of it". Also - you spend most of your post slamming m_c, and then vote me over...two lines complaining that you disagreed with my reasons for voting Snow (which you also got wrong, see above). Le what, monsieur?
Somewhat tempted to actually vote him if it weren't for the fact that it all comes off far more as "completely clueless noob" than someone actually Scummy.
Wall of text that at-best reports and at-worst misrepresents. (And flaming). Calls Glen incompetent (as an easy way to dismiss the argument) when I'm not getting that vibe at all.
Oh, come on now Glen, you can't seriously be stating that a single short paragraph in my opening game post that basically was to the effect of "yeah, I agree with Kilga, the Noynsense is pretty much closed for now" is somehow an attempt to restart discussion around him? Seriously? I will admit my opening sentence was sort of badly worded, but you can see from reading, y'know, the rest of that paragraph, that there's not much more to discuss here.
A simple "whoops that was badly worded" would have sufficed; paragraph!
correct me if I'm wrong here but I was under the assumption that m_c was, at one point, a regular player here.
Nope, this is my first mafia game,
as I have mentioned in some of my posts so...it's a little surprising you're unaware of it (oh, Laggy also mentioned it, and Laggy/Glen is your other top target).
Mmmmm...I really,
really don't like the writing style of Alice's posts. Responding to it, I feel like I'm...to quote Alice, "playing gotcha games", but the posts are written in such a way that I find them hard to respond to
without playing gotcha games. Alice's "content"...half of it is easy to verify as incorrect.
Okay, sec, going to see how many NINJAs I have...10!
Hmm...I'll read over those in a sec; major trains seem to be Alice and Glen, and as previously mentioned I'm actually liking Glen's current content a lot more than Laggy (who was only minorly negative).
##Vote: Alice
