##VOTE: Tickand now to do something, that, in retrospect, i should have done a while back, but now i just get to make it look like omgus. what fun, you know?
this has two things. something that appears mudslingy on CP ("You look kinda off." as the main justification? really?) and saying Hazel made sense. it took pressure by Smax to refine this any further, to...
this. which, okay, this explains some... except. except you claim that he's using another's arguments as opportunism. he/Saber were the only two that voted Kirk there, and Saber's vote was over being confused at Kirk's attack on Batmanuel (all roads lead to Batmanuel, it seems?) comparing the two of them's arguments...
SaberCap'n Crunchplanet...it seems to me the two arguments are completely different: Saber calls Kirk out due to her incredulity that they failed to recognize Batmanuel's first post as a jokepost. Captain Planet breaks down Kirk's first argument there some more and calls it into question. iow there was no opportunism present, CP was presenting a new argument (whether or not it holds water is a story to return to later, i suspect)
this is the swap to Prinny. about the one post that felt productive, here. and imagine that, it was the last post of the day. mmm. at that time prinny only had two votes, yours the second, and there were only nine hours and change left. wonder if you never thought the train would actually take off? had no reason to suspect it, at least not at that point, but for now this is still a mark in your favor.
this is the first post targeting me, in which you mudsling - yes, it's mudslinging, as you blatantly refuse to provide any examples, proof, -links-, anything, to even remotely justify these claims. "suspicious interactions with prinny"? that reads straight as mudslinging, 'm afraid. "bogus list"? no explanation. "fluff"? what gorramm fluff? you mean like your little RP tossouts? yes, i do the same. as much a scumtell for me as it is for you, dude. "dubious voting record"? what, that i had my vote on Saber at one point? that i chose to denote my willingness to vote Middleman in an unorthodox way?
url and here you say there's commentary about Hazel that looks suspicious. but... don't provide sources, references or -links-
and really, i hammer the link part home, because one would think you'd think of providing links to what you consider suspicious instead of quoting "out of context" if you, you know, actually bothered to read my posts and notice that oh, hey, links are bloody useful things!
tl;dr: mudslinging, epically contentless, his argument on CP is nonsensical after review, his argument on me is entirely smear campaign, i don't get his fascination with the rabbit, but this reads entirely like scum attempting to coast by tossing out one or two lines and then disappearing again. i am ashamed that it took Tick mudslinging at me to make me wipe off the interface and see precisely what he'd been doing but there you go, i'm hardly perfect at this vigilance thing.
in his favor he was second on the prinny train but i personally consider that a null tell at this point (others might disagree, thus why i add it here) - little reason to believe at the time that the train would take off with Middleman around, though i'm glad it did as it took down scum.
others, thoughts on this case? i'll return the courtesy in the morning, i really don't have much more to say on Tick - Almaz's case had multiple possible end interps, some of which i would have been hammering down on him for, but he has resolved my issues to my satisfaction. Tick has simply attempted slander on both CP and me at this point, and i can't be bothered to reply seriously to any attempts he may make to try and add substance to this.
Show Posts
