Messages

1

Forum Games / Re: You know what I meme?(Meme Mafia: Day 2)

« on: March 08, 2010, 09:44:37 AM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

I think perhaps the problem might be stemming from a contradictory use of words. I am thinking of lurker in terms of someone who is particularly avoiding posting instead of someone who is posting, but managing to avoid content of note. The former is not at all useful to town, but isn't consistently a tell except in certain circumstances, while the other is pure, textbook scum play. They sometimes sorta overlap (minimalized posting + no content). So, its possible I've been talking past you.

Since its your big case of the day, though Soviet, could you do me a favor and do the cliff's note version of your Astley argument for me? It would be appreciated as well.

For the time being, though, this is good enough for me to move on. I still don't like a lot of what Soviet has been doing (and none of it really adds up), but sticking to this like a rabid pack of zerglings isn't really going to help make progress on the day.

##Unvote: Soviet

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Thanks Advice Dog.

Yeah, you do well to highlight some distressing play elements. The XBox vote today... really looks bad. Like, "I'm willing to start considering XBox/-2C silly scum team" bad. Exact same lurker over scummy folks issue I had problems with Soviet for (except even more pronounced, since XBox was a true, non-presence lurker) as well. Its good enough to earn a ##Vote: C-C-C-C-Combo Breaker

I certainly would like to hear the promised more!

2

Forum Games / Re: You know what I meme?(Meme Mafia: Day 2)

« on: March 07, 2010, 10:16:49 PM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Things that are not helpful:

1. Apologies.
2. Statements that you can't get into game as much as we'd like.
3. Excuses for presence to anyone who is not the mod.

Let us see a little less of all three.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

In regards to Soviet, while I can understand the imperative to make sure lurkers don't get away with lurking, focusing in on them over scummy behavior is just strange to me. Especially when you add in that little tidbit about "look, look, I'm totally right!" Yes, lurkers are bad, but focusing in on them can do next to nothing for town as well for a variety of reasons. At the very least, spending time looking back on the people you didn't like and dredging up either support or a breakdown of your argument WHILE PURSUING LURKERS would be very useful. Just sort of scattershotting and then latching onto a lurker? Not so much. Attacking lurkers is fine and good, but if you spend too much time looking at people who aren't doing anything, then you're going to get blindsided by the active scum.

So let us make sure this is 100% clear. Pursuing lurkers is fine, but I still, even after hearing from you, dislike the fact that you didn't put effort into digging up more substantiation on the people you thought looked bad, and the slight tinge of directing people away from looking for active scum doesn't sit well at all for me.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Looking back on All Your Base, there are several things about his posts that do not sit well with me. Day 1 content, although it looked fairly big (a lot of words to be said), it isn't as much content as it actually looks like, which is never particularly good. The big thing that gets me, though, is the "scum wouldn't play that stupid" argument, because once you start thinking that way, you've pretty much already lost to WIFOM. Similarly, he indulges in this again in Day 2 with the lolcat/soviet vote. There are actually very good reasons to push on a scum bus train when there is a simultaneous town train! Massive cred, provided you can make the right arguments. And, of course, the classic "I'll post shortly" followed by disappearing. Utterly useless, slightly suspicious but a decent smokescreen. Want to see this promised post.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Advice Dog: Could you do a chattering horde of insectile beasts a favor and post just a quick, condensed, cliff notes version of your argument on -2C? I'd appreciate it.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

3

Forum Games / Re: You know what I meme?(Meme Mafia: Day 2)

« on: March 06, 2010, 11:18:12 PM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Since I failed to bold in my last post, let's make sure what I did was clear and recorded.

##Vote: The Cake is a Lie

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Now then, with the defensive claim in mind.

##Unvote: The Cake is a Lie

Unless there's a counterclaim or such, that's enough to get me off your case for the moment. My previous complaints still stand however. Its been documented that 3rd parties are possible in this set-up, so, shooting lolcats does not particularly make you a townie, even if there is no counterclaim. It does mean you can be potentially useful though, so you get to live for the moment. Hurrah!

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

So, for the moment, I'll fall back to my secondary case. ##Vote: Russia

Looking at your post from this day, I'm not particularly fond of what you do. You throw out about five different suspicions, then go and attack two different lurker angles. Are you saying the lurkers are worse then your suspicions? Do you have any particular ranking to your suspicions? Do you think the cases on your five suspicions are weaker then the cases on two day one lurkers? I'm very curious as to why you put your vote down where you did, instead of anywhere else, and why you chose to only give short, one point arguments instead of actually looking deeper into things.

4

Forum Games / Re: You know what I meme?(Meme Mafia: Day 2)

« on: March 06, 2010, 08:25:34 AM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Having looked back through lolcat's posts... I'm kinda surprised to see how very little they actually commented in-game. Like, next to nothing of value was said. They primarily attacked Russia and focused on the WIFOMY elements of the arguments around him, complained about my posting style, talked about lurkers (and vaguely dismissed them, in some regards) and joke voted Advice Dog. Hurrah.

Risk taking scum team-up with Russia seems possible if you assume them going with some sort of high risk, high reward scenario.

Relatedly, I do find the late day vote switch of Russia's to be somewhat strange, considering the cases involved. Generally speaking, townies, when confronted with the major lynch cases being them and someone else, should always fight hard to keep their own necks intact, since they are themselves the only 100% guaranteed townie. Given he was still in notable danger at that point, it seems weird to not have kept the vote there, while making the other cases. Its hard not to see this as something of an attempt to be able to show up on Day 2 and go "Well, look how clever I was!"

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Concerns about Cake from yesterday remain.

Looking back, I also notice they emphasized my "unfriendliness" (he notes it twice) which seems pretty iffy to me, as it was basically attacking me for what should have been pretty clear as flavor. In fact, much like lolcats, Cake really didn't have much to say yesterday beyond the "shouldn't push the zerg case further" thing and focus in on 9001/Russia.

I REALLY do not like the Jester backpedal. At all. To quote.

9000.1 is getting continually worse. 'Hey, let's STILL give no opinions and jump on a lurker! No wonder I'm almost as strong as Kakarot!' It gets to the point where you have to wonder if he really IS a jester...which concerns me slightly, but it's a WIFOM at best.

Soviet ACTUALLY TRYING TO PRESS A NO LYNCH THEN TURNING AROUND AND SAYING IT WAS TO BUILD DISCUSSION makes me want to flood his head with a neurotoxin. Doing so would put him at L-1, though, and it's not impossible for Vegeta!Scum to fake jester if they've been told that the setup has third-party and bastard mod in it. Holding for now.

This was not an excuse to do something. This was me saying 'no, this jester WIFOM is stupid, we shouldn't let 9000.1 away with scummy play because he MIGHT be fool'. I'm more convinced at this moment that 9000.1 is scum, and given that he's likely going to die anyway, what's likely to happen if we're wrong on Soviet? Vegeta throws a quickhammer and at least manages to waste a day for Town before his inevitable death.
I don't understand how I've been misinterpreted as saying 'Soviet might be jester, better not lynch him!' I was saying '9000.1 probably ISN'T jester, so why the hell aren't we lynching him?'

Post number two really reeks of revisionist history to me, and given the aggression in it, I'm not getting an apologetic townie "Sorry, I misspoke" vibe from it. His first post indulges in a bit of WIFOM/fear mongering and then he goes out his way to say that his entire point is that 9001 probably isn't a jester! Well then why claim the potential concerns you at all? Giving any credence at all to the jester concept is still giving credence to it. You didn't say Jester WIFOM was stupid. You said it "concerns you slightly, but..." Not the same thing at all. Also, the whole "I want to kill Russia, but scum 9001" is kinda... iffy to me. While the sentiment itself is all right in some regards, the strength of your statement AGAINST Russia juxtaposed with the statement about fearing 9001 quick lynch feels really odd.

The general, casual reporter restatement of the obvious events also isn't particularly good here. Pretty much agree with Tohou in regards to not liking the preemptive defense. And, of course, given my above opinions on what I'm seeing as quasi-revisionist history, the fact that you are using that as a springboard to attack OH GOD is not really a good start to me.

##Vote: The Cake is a Lie

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

5

Forum Games / Re: Say It Like You Meme It(Meme Mafia: Day 1)

« on: March 04, 2010, 02:31:19 AM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

On the subject of speculation about roles in role madness: Its pretty useless overall. Its called role madness for a reason. Worrying about Jesters is silly. For all we know, there's someone who wins the game if they get lynched on day two instead! Once you accept that the game is role madness and that Jester is possible, then you might as well throw in the hat as far as role guessing goes, because anything goes. If we lose to a Jester, then we lost due to questionable mod decisions. We can't not play the game due to silliness like that.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

On the main lynch candidates (9001 and Soviet Russia), I feel 9001 is the scummier candidate at this point. Frankly, I'm not really sure what Soviet Russia was going for (making questionable statements to get conversation going is not really a good plan if you ask me) but I just can't really figure how his behavior works out for scum except as a form of refuge in audacity. He certainly bears watching, and I wouldn't object to lynching him (daring scum gambit possibility does exist) but I feel that 9001 is the better candidate.

On the whole, 9001 has looked scummier to me, by attempting to appear as a contributing townie without... really adding anything. His actions regarding my train were odd, and his defense has consisted of vague reporter posts and... getting good vibes from people attacking him? This isn't exactly a solid defense here Honestly, I'm kind of curious why you opted to attack in on a lurker (and why, in going after lurkers, which I feel oddly included me, you ignored HUEG LIKE ULTRALISK) instead of addressing people involved or uninvolved in my lynch train. Given concerns about the results of an early train like that, I'm surprised that the people worried about quicklynches don't really focus in on that idea to some extent.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

I'm also kinda concerned about HUEG LIKE ULTRALISK not simply because of lurking and not because he was "getting away with it," but because the people calling out lurkers were ignoring him. If anyone who called on lurkers but ignored him flips scum, I definitely think he's worth looking further into.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

6

Forum Games / Re: Say It Like You Meme It(Meme Mafia: Day 1)

« on: March 03, 2010, 02:39:50 AM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Man, srsly. You accuse us humble Zerglings of SRS BSNS... Some of you all are really reacting ridiculously to me voting on Advice Dog's suicide vote.

On the subject of my vote on Advice Dog:

1. This is Day One, where you don't have that much to go on and thus need to go after what you do find to get out of the joke vote phase.
2. That, regardless of joke vote intent or not, self votes are particularly scummy because they create a stupid WIFOM situation.
3. That I wasn't attacking Advice Dog that harshly or demean your play. I was playing a character. You know, Zerg Rushing + Blizzard gamer?
4. "Woe is me, martyr'd by those nasty little Zerglings" is not a particularly reassuring stance to take. You had a fun joke vote. That's fine! Its a fun game! Don't get your rainbow in a bunch because your joke is still inherently scummy and you get called out on it and I pursued a case.

Honestly, that last post strikes me as particularly scummy, to be perfectly honest. It really seems to be holding up a martyr flag, which is totally unnecessary at this point.

I do find it oddly curious how hard people came down on me for picking a scummy subject to start conversation from. Is the joke vote stage totally sacred or something? I see scummy, I go after scummy. All pretending to be scum, even jokingly, does is obfuscate the situation. "Well, of course he must be town, because scum would never do that, but that means that scum could do this and..."

So, in summation: lulz, QQ butthurt nublet. L2PLAYMAFIA. Day one cases, lulz.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Cake's position is less stable then a drone rush, in my humble opinion. Not voting to avoid other people not voting is kind of silly. Besides, people can still strongly express opinions without actually having a vote down. They can also make alternate cases and put the votes to use there! By your own logic, people could get away with not weighing in for the same reason you got away with not weighing in. It also occurs to me that, looking back, you don't... actually... have anything to say about me/the people on me/my stance. You just mention the voting thing and leave it at that.

That's more suspicious then a little red dot in the middle of my base.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

In Soviet Russia... you get Zerg Rushed and die because you can't hunt scum without lynching. By the time you get to work, I've already won via MASS CARRIERS... and I'm not even Protoss. If there is no lynch, what exactly do we have to discuss on Day 2? We'll be in the exact same position as Day 1, except with one less townie. The only thing I can guess you are suggesting is we all mass roleclaim and try to puzzle it out from there. Which is... of questionable use, presuming a well designed game.

This plan is... not very good.

The lack of contribution about anything else is also not a good sign. Advice Dog following up on this generally makes me feel a bit better about him. Just a bit.

##Nyssus: Soviet Russia

If you don't provide any real content soon, there will likely be Zerglings inside your base, killing your dudes.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Lurkers desperately need to post. HUEG LIKE ULTRALISK has been MIA too, right? Lurkers buried in the middle of nowhere are useless Lurkers. Hydralisks > You.

Honestly, I find it kinda suspicious that HUEG LIKE ULTRALISK is pretty much the lurkiest lurker that has lurked thus far and no one seems to be acknowledging his presence whatsoever. Like, at all. People do remember he is in the game, right?

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Honestly, there was no danger of quick lynching me. Nobody is faster then a Zerg Rush and, if they are, they are clearly cheating. Which means they are not town.

7

Forum Games / Re: Say It Like You Meme It(Meme Mafia: Day 1)

« on: March 02, 2010, 05:25:27 PM »

KEKE! KEKE!

Lolz, nooblets, QQ about one strange, early game vote then QQ about someone voting for srs on one strange early game vote. GG.

L2CONSISTENCY, kk? Lulz, voting over srs Mafia. Game has to start sometime, nublets, and one dumb vote from a terribad is still one dumb vote from a terribad.

KEKE! KEKEKEKE! KEKEKEKE! KEKEKEKE!

If ur srs no lynch is bad and ur a quitter terribad too. Besides, in Korea, we hate Russian anyway. Just as useless as as self vote, and slightly worse looking. Might as well tech pure medic, mirite?

CA-KEKE! CA-KEKEKEKE!

lol, wimp. Zerg rushes are srs bsns, as are mafia. If Apeture Science Vessel Cake Liar have case u push case, u don't just go 'lolz look he losing and bad so I not vote cause we'll accidentally day one lynch.'

KEKEKEKE! KEKEKEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKEKEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKEKEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKE! KEKEKEKE! KEKE!

Opinionless noob looks worst to me. OVER 9000? Moar like OVER-LY USELESS, mirite? He's all "u all are going on the attack, so I gonna tech up like scrub in meanwhile, kk?" L2haveopinion.

##Unvote: Advice Dog
##Vote: OVER 9000

Still like Advice Dog less then siege tanks for lulz bad dumb vote, but like OVER 9000 less for lulz lack of opinion. Reds are also bads for not wanting to play game and need to explain themselves 2.

8

Forum Games / Re: Say It Like You Meme It(Meme Mafia: Day 1)

« on: March 01, 2010, 11:22:55 PM »

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

Quitters are terribads. All a quitter does is make you waste your time by being a Bad. They see some zerglings coming and WAAAAAH WAAAAH NERF NERF QQ I R BAD CRY.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKE.

Pretending to be a Bad is as good as being a Bad. Goods should know better and real Bads can get away by pretending to be not Bads by acting like dumb not Bads.

L2PTOUHOU NOOBLET.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

9

Forum Games / Re: Say It Like You Meme It(Meme Mafia: Day 1)

« on: March 01, 2010, 06:34:11 PM »

KEKEKEKEKEKE!

L2P N00B. QQ DOGGY.

##UNVOTE: OH GOD SHANA IS HOT
##VOTE: ADVICE DOG

QUITTERS ARE TERRIBADS.

KEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKEKE!

10

Forum Games / Re: Say It Like You Meme It(Meme Mafia: Day 1)

« on: March 01, 2010, 06:02:09 PM »

(Four pool rushes almost always result in failure, a lesson we must all learn at one time or another in our transition from larvae to full fledged swarms. Remember, my fellow zerglings, to wait just a little longer then that.)

##Vote: OH GOD SHANA IS HOT

KEKEKEKEKE! NOT A MEME ACCORDING TO KNOWYOURMEME! KEKEKEKEKE!

11

Forum Games / Re: Internet Meme Anonymafia Signups!

« on: February 28, 2010, 10:49:34 PM »

Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke! Kekekeke!

12

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 15, 2010, 11:56:21 PM »

Well, what am I suppose to do, doods? I guess suicide is pro-town after all?

13

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 15, 2010, 11:53:37 PM »

Whoa doods, I just realized I forgot to change my vote last post.

##Unvote: Flay
##Vote: Middleman

Umm, sorry for tying it up again, doods.
Lynching Middleman is just the better choice now, doods. It's obvious he's not going to show any interest in future days from what he just posted. Plus, I did a lot of work writing down what everyone said today, so I'd like that not to go to waste at least since I'm not in the neitherworld right now, dood.

14

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 15, 2010, 08:40:08 PM »

WHOA! Why is everyone suddenly going after me, dood?

First of all, dood, I don't really see the problem in bandwagoning with good reason. Most of the votes on middleman had intention of getting him to talk, doods! When that Flay dood voted, all he did was apologize for the case on Kirk, and gave one reason for the vote on middleman. The same reason everyone else did before him, too, dood.

...but I guess everyone else on the same wagon could be accused of that, dood. Of that though, dood, only the rabbit and Flay were the ones who didn't talk about anybody else yet.

Also, why that middledood getting off the hook now? His last post was just a vote made on Hazel doing that same thing as your and Hazel's vote for him. There's way too much hypocracy going around to pin this all on me, dood. whoa, dood. That felt good saying something like that out loud for once!

I guess since I read that rabbit's posting again, it really is just one reason covered in flavor, dood. I Should know better than to use the amount of words as a gauge for content, huh doods? Especially since Demons are always lying. Always, dood. I think lynching middleman or the rabbit would be a much better choice than me, doods!

I also don't like the look of Hiro's vote change, dood. How much time did you think we had when you made it? And did you really vote someone because you wanted to ask them about a case they made, dood? Is that really worth a vote?

15

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 15, 2010, 03:23:15 AM »

I-I mean ##Vote Flay Gunnar dood!

Please don't whip me! Or Flambe me! Or Grind my body in the ground! Or throw me across the courtyard! Or shoot me in the foot! Or stab me a few thousand times! Or chop me! Or Maul me! Please dood, I'm not ready to die!

16

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 15, 2010, 03:08:21 AM »

Dood, That bat demon completely ignored what I said. Not cool.

I fed this entire conversation though BableDemon (translating from "Incoherrent babbling" to "dood speak", in case you wanted to know!). It was a long process, but I got everything up until now down in my Prinnybook, dood!

And harping on about him reading Bats wrong doesn't really fly either since the penguin made the same call and no one's busting him for it.

P-penguin? I'm a Prinny, dood!

I was voting Batdood for a completely different reason, though. babledemon says you guys voted because he was being serious, dood. I voted because he talked about bandwagoning the same way our Overlord would talk about using guns, dood.

Speaking of which, dood, I'd still like an answer to that! Although I guess I don't expect one

Now stop picking on the weak, and arguing about things like fluff and slang. Forced arguments are weak arguments, and weak arguments only serve to harm town!

Umm, I hate to break it to you dood, but the argument between Kirk and Saber looks like it was a nessicery evil. Yeah, it was an argument about semantics, but can you really have stopped that argument from happening, dood? Even if you were one of the ones arguing?

Only a Prinny knows how to shut up during an argument, dood, and even then it's only because it's part of our survival instinct.

Now stop picking on the weak, and arguing about things like fluff and slang. Forced arguments are weak arguments, and weak arguments only serve to harm town!

Whoa dood! You're pretty slow on the uptake, aren't you?

...

WHOA-HOA-HOA! L-LET ME DOWN! DON'T THROW ME, PLEASE, I'M SORRY!

...Phew, I'm glad I still have this scarf, dood.

Rabbithazel concerns me for doing much the same, but with more words behind it.

I don't know, dood. The Rabbit's wording at least looks like she put thought and feeling into the vote. Flay just kind of ... hops bandwagons, dood.

##Unvote Batmanuel
Vote Flay Gunnar

Also, the Tick doesn't sit right with me either. Bugs are sort of creepy, dood. Especially the ones that just sit there and stare at you, dood.

17

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 13, 2010, 04:00:11 PM »

Words

Words

A Thousand words

Slightly fewer words

Words

Why does this have to be so complicated, doods? I can barely read all of this, much less understand it.

He does succumb to peer pressure and jokevote.  I am afraid I cannot allow competition for dem apples. 

That's a pretty weird way of saying "Bandwagoning is bad unless I'm doing it!"

##Unvote
##Vote Batmanuel

18

Forum Games / Re: VALIANT HERO Mafia! [Day One]

« on: February 13, 2010, 01:31:28 AM »

Whoa-Ho-hooo! you mean we could get murdered doods? I don't like the sound of this.

In all my years, dood, I've only met one group of people that is more evil than Master Etna, and that's hippies. Those doods have done lots of things you wouldn't even believe to others and themselves just for the sake of trees. There's something wrong with them, doods.

##Vote: Captain Planet

What kind of a hero can a PENGUIN be!?

You're one to talk, dood. Don't you become a Super Villain at the end of the first game?

19

Forum Games / Re: Hero Mafia! [Sign-Ups]

« on: February 12, 2010, 09:09:00 AM »

Wassup, D00ds?

I won't have to worry about working under Etna for a while. I was just recently fired from a cannon.

20

Forum Games / Re: Villainous Anonymafia - Day 5 Almost Certain LYLO

« on: February 08, 2010, 06:51:39 AM »

you better not screw me on this one

##Vote: Beatrice

'ERE WE GO

21

Forum Games / Re: Villainous Anonymafia - Day 4

« on: February 06, 2010, 02:09:21 PM »

I'z also 'ere! And I'z ready to turbo dis train' wif da fast stuff!

##VOTE: BOWSER

22

Forum Games / Re: Villainous Anonymafia - Day 3

« on: February 05, 2010, 02:40:15 PM »

I'z seein' dat dat witchy girl i'z half da game, explainin' all dat deduktive logik stuff. I'z sorta seeing da jokah's GUT which iz fine, she'z lookin' to make as much prezence as possible. But I'z only got two extremes 'ere thanks to da others in da game; constant prezence or no prezence. Wat's da deal? I'z thinkin we can safely lynch all da most likely suspects now anywayz, and by dat I mean, beatrix, joker, and bowza (az well as burnsie and edna who are dyin' anyway, roight?) Dere's all dat worryin' about lining up a lynch I guess, but it'z wot I'm thinkin' anywayz.

Az for dat potato, I'z gonna toss it away on someone we'z likely ta lynch next turn, probably dat bowzer.

23

Forum Games / Re: Villainous Anonymafia - Day 3

« on: February 04, 2010, 09:22:19 PM »

I'Z DA BIGGEST, SO I'M DA BOSS! Get dat through yer 'eads or I'll knock 'em together, boyz!

I'z not seein' why scum-Gig'z gonna save anyone with dat powa, least of all Gaston! I'z not skared of a Burnz lynch either, 'ez up and vanished! 'as haz Bowzer! I'z got nothin' else if de'z not showin'!

And I'z buzy t'day! Got a big WAAAAAAAAAAGH to deal wif! I'z always wif me boyz in spirit, though!

24

Forum Games / Re: Villainous Anonymafia - Day 3

« on: February 04, 2010, 09:10:42 AM »

Me boy'z are good un's! I'z yelled at 'em and dey'z yelled at me and we'z not good at lyin' to each udder's face! I know'z who they are, they couldn't fool me! We'z gonna stand togeda!

We'z not had da time ta talk since d3 started'z up, but we'z thought burns was skummy before. ez' votin' for silly things! Like pie! Or not bein' on any of a buncha townie trains! And e'z soft-confirmed Gig and Gaston back in day 2 'ere when he shouldn't 'ave-

At the possibility of Gaston getting delayed killed... Gig's summon did prove effective seeing as Gaston did get saved. Now if it was planned or not, hard to say.

Now we'z not having known if Gaston'd been saved den, do we? But but but we know'z scum'z gonna believe any claim town put's out, roight, 'cuz town would never eva lie 'less dey were some legendary hero, roight?

##Vote: Burns

Dat bowzer ain't dat orky enough either! Lots 'uv agreement! Not much content!

25

Forum Games / Re: Villainous Anonymafia - Day 2

« on: February 03, 2010, 11:42:57 AM »

Gaston will back it up soon enough.

I didn't see any value in not claiming everyone at once, anyhow.