Author Topic: Bright (vs Shiba)  (Read 519 times)

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Bright (vs Shiba)
« on: February 22, 2008, 06:16:09 PM »
Sure, we talk about the intelligence of lesser creatures such as dragons. Sometimes we even talk them up into great and noble creatures. With dragons, particularly, we sometimes imbue them with intelligence not just equal to our own, but monumentally greater. Consider, then, the case of Bright. Bright is the proud draconic steed of Futch, and supposedly, he is a clever beast indeed. It would be all too easy to get trapped in the web of personification. Yes, Bright is clever for a dragon, and yes, he served alongside Shiba valiantly in the Second Fire Bringer war. The sad simple truth, however, is that Bright wasn't fed for a day and a half before the match, and lizards is good eating. Sure, you could hope for a world of puppy dogs and rainbows where Bright won't eat his good friend and war ally, but smart money for this match is bet on the Dragon.

Shale

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5800
    • View Profile
Re: Bright (vs Shiba)
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2008, 04:17:21 AM »
Consider the case of Bright. Bright is the proud draconic steed of Futch, and supposedly, he is a clever beast indeed. So it would be all too easy to personify him. Yes, Bright is clever for a dragon, and yes, he served alongside Shiba valiantly in the Second Fire Bringer war, but don't think he'll fight with a human's honor. The sad simple truth, however, is that Bright wasn't fed for a day and a half before the match, and lizards is good eating. Sure, you could hope for a world of puppy dogs and rainbows where Bright won't eat his good friend and ally, but smart money for this match is on the Dragon.
"Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology."
-Ponder Stibbons

[23:02] <Veryslightlymad> CK dreams about me starring in porno?
[23:02] <CmdrKing> Pretty sure.