Author Topic: Idiot of the Day (Read 254339 times)

Jo'ou Ranbu · « **Reply #1000 on:** October 13, 2009, 05:28:56 PM »

Quote from: Ciato on October 13, 2009, 04:31:55 PM

I'm going to second VSM in the "that kind of stuff would have been fine at my school" thing. I may have brought an Army Swiss knife to school before. I thought they were badass, and I didn't really think of the consequences. I just thought it was cool.

Zero tolerance policy is a giant joke. I think that 3 months of forcing any student, child or adolescent, out of school is really harmful to them and any school who chooses to do this is ridiculous. Yay structure.

More or less my thoughts. Heck, we brought homemade stilettos to school in order to sharpen pencils back then and we never had a case of stabbing either when I was a kid (heck, even when I was a teenager). I guess we do live in different times, but there's a lot of hysteria and absolutely no common sense in this debacle.

Excal · « **Reply #1001 on:** October 13, 2009, 09:59:33 PM »

Yeah, just to chime in, but when I was in middle school I had a pocket knife that I'd use to sharpen my pencils with because the ones the school had were useless.

superaielman · « **Reply #1002 on:** October 13, 2009, 10:12:10 PM »

I'll mostly echo everyone else about the actual retardation of this. Zero tolerance policies are the worst.

Related note, I didn't even think children that young could be legally head accountable for violent actions.

Yakumo · « **Reply #1003 on:** October 14, 2009, 05:10:52 AM »

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091014/ap_on_re_us/us_zero_tolerance_boy

Well, I guess at least they're not idiots of the year or anything.

Anthony Edward Stark · « **Reply #1004 on:** October 14, 2009, 10:03:22 PM »

http://www.artlurker.com/2009/09/the-rape-tunnel-by-sheila-zareno/

Quote

The artist plans to place himself in a room, the only entrance or exit being a 22 ft long plywood tunnel constructed by Whitehurst himself. Then he says that for the duration of the gallery’s opening (from 7:00 p.m. to midnight) he will rape anyone who travels through the tunnel into that room.

This is considered art, apparently. My favorite statement comes from the Q&A section:

Quote

Maybe I won’t be able to rape everyone who crawls through the tunnel, but the door is open for all kinds of scenarios

Ultradude · « **Reply #1005 on:** October 14, 2009, 10:47:02 PM »

Quote

I started to think differently about my work. In 2007 at the Seward Projects Space in Columbus, I had my first breakthrough with an installation that was to be the prototype for this current one. It was called THE PUNCH-YOU-IN-THE-FACE TUNNEL. It was the same set-up as THE RAPE TUNNEL except at the end of the tunnel I’d punch the subject in the face instead of raping him or her. The impetus was completely reactionary to the current state of art, and motivated by pure frustration.

As it turns out, I ended up breaking the nose of the third person to crawl through the tunnel, an aspiring model. She went to the hospital and eventually sued me. Her modeling career was put on hold. The civil case was long and drawn out and the matter still hasn’t been resolved. To this day she still has unpaid medical bills. The point of this long aside is that all this took place two years ago, and I’m still having an impact on this young lady’s life, something not many other artists could claim about their work.

Rape seemed like the next logical step.

Obviously.

(Trolling or an actual, real-life troll in a tunnel?)

Jo'ou Ranbu · « **Reply #1006 on:** October 14, 2009, 11:51:12 PM »

* Jo'ou Ranbu reads article, headdesks.

Goddamn, fuck postmodernist "art" in the eye.

Luther Lansfeld · « **Reply #1007 on:** October 15, 2009, 12:03:12 AM »

Quote from: Yakumo on October 14, 2009, 05:10:52 AM

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091014/ap_on_re_us/us_zero_tolerance_boy

Well, I guess at least they're not idiots of the year or anything.

*thumbs up* Good good.

Cotigo · « **Reply #1008 on:** October 15, 2009, 12:58:06 AM »

What? The Rape Tunnel is hilarious and awesome. The only idiocy comes from anyone who actually WENT INTO THE TUNNEL.

Their own god damn fault if they did. It's not like what's actually going to happen isn't advertised.

EDIT: From the blurb when Jacques announced the possibility of the "Yaoi Zone" shirt...

Quote

People...people actually want "YAOI ZONE" t-shirts. My mind is blown.

Y'know, it's nice to know that there are corners of the internet where Niu isn't the norm. >_>

Jo'ou Ranbu · « **Reply #1009 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:04:33 AM »

It's awesome in a schadenfreude sense. But then the artiste starts taking his work seriously and then I feel the urge to pummel middle-aged salesmen with a 2x4.

Xeroma · « **Reply #1010 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:08:13 AM »

Please tell me you can get arrested for that crap.

Cotigo · « **Reply #1011 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:13:23 AM »

Why? Your own damn fault for going into the tunnel. You've given consent right there.

Sure, the artist is a tool (aren't they all?), but hell he's basically BEGGING to get tazed if anyone with a hint of forethought actually goes into the tunnel. Can't really work up the energy to get mad over that.

Jo'ou Ranbu · « **Reply #1012 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:20:03 AM »

I'd say that announcing out loud the intent to wantonly, potentially perenially, harm people at a public event would qualify as something that can get you behind bars, semantics be damned. I'd be shocked if he couldn't get sexual assault attempt charges dropped on his head for that shit. It's like the Beagle Brothers paying a two-minute ad announcing they're going to rob Wall Street at 3PM with tommy guns, only done by someone who somehow couldn't find a better method of getting laid.

Cotigo · « **Reply #1013 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:26:01 AM »

Quote from: Jo'ou Ranbu on October 15, 2009, 01:20:03 AM

It's like the Beagle Brothers paying a two-minute ad announcing they're going to rob Wall Street at 3PM with tommy guns, only done by someone who somehow couldn't find a better method of getting laid.

Except not at all. For this exhibit, in order for him to actually RAPE anyone, they have to GO THROUGH THE GOD DAMN TUNNEL.

It's more like the whatever brothers announcing that they're going to murder someone, but only if they let them. The act of WALKING THROUGH A LONG TUNNEL THAT GETS SMALLER AS YOU GO IN, while KNOWING DAMN WELL THAT YOU WILL BE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED, requires volition. A will! A desire to go down the tunnel, and get raped. It's not even a semantics argument.

Now, if someone was forced down the tunnel by someone else, the question is more interesting: Who is the rapist, the one who committed the assault or the one who forced the victim down the tunnel?

EDIT: I realize now that I did not make myself clear. I do not think he should be arrested for the announcement, or the exhibit itself. If he actually goes through with it and rapes someone, however, him getting arrested and taken to court is 100% reasonable, and the artist damn well be prepared for a lengthy court battle. The argument of whether or not it is rape is something that should be decided in court anyway.

EDIT 2: On an even more inappropriate note, that court case would be the first in recent memory where the "They was ASKING for it" defense could be taken even remotely seriously.

metroid composite · « **Reply #1014 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:44:53 AM »

Quote from: Jo'ou Ranbu on October 15, 2009, 01:20:03 AM

I'd say that announcing out loud the intent to wantonly, potentially perenially, harm people at a public event would qualify as something that can get you behind bars, semantics be damned. I'd be shocked if he couldn't get sexual assault attempt charges dropped on his head for that shit. It's like the Beagle Brothers paying a two-minute ad announcing they're going to rob Wall Street at 3PM with tommy guns, only done by someone who somehow couldn't find a better method of getting laid.

Well...no, that's not exactly parallel.

It would be like "the robbery tunnel--go into this tunnel, and we will take your wallet." There's clearly consent involved at some point (and particularly with sex, consent is usually the difference between rape and not-rape). Where legality comes into play in the robbery tunnel is that I don't think it's legal to hold on to someone else's credit cards and drivers licences if they request they be returned. Similarly, rape can cause all kinds of stuff that can't be undone, like broken hymens, pregnancy, STDs, psychological damage, physical tearing (note: ctrl-F for Condom on that article produces no results). And, well, people with rape fantasies do exist, so it's not inconceivable that someone would go into that tunnel to fulfill a fantasy, and come out with more than they bargained for. So...frankly yeah, I doubt this is legal, or if it goes forward I doubt it will end with him outside of jail.

If nothing else, it could probably be called prostitution. Presumably he's being paid for his museum display, or gaining attention as an artist, so there's an economic benefit, and he's offering sex.

Crystalgate · « **Reply #1015 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:47:43 AM »

Quote from: Makkotah on October 15, 2009, 01:13:23 AM

Why? Your own damn fault for going into the tunnel. You've given consent right there.

I don't know what exactly the law is in wherever place the rape tunnel is to be made, but chance is sexual consent can be retracted at any time.

Anyway, I suggest tossing in tear gas.

Ultradude · « **Reply #1016 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:51:50 AM »

http://www.geversaircraft.com/wt/wt5x7.htm

...I'm pretty sure the announcement is the ACTUAL art.

As in, he's not even building a tunnel - he's trying to get a reaction and then say "lolItrollu"

So uh, artistic trolling wut.

NotMiki · « **Reply #1017 on:** October 15, 2009, 01:56:48 AM »

It may depress you to know that there is a real artist, well-respected, who is the clear inspiration here. Pioneer in the performance art field. He had an exhibit once that consisted of him lying underneath the floorboards of a gallery and masturbating while talking about the people there to see his show. That was back in the early '70s, when performance art was in its heyday. I wish I were making this up.

Anthony Edward Stark · « **Reply #1018 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:22:00 AM »

Performance art is fucking terrible, one. And two, I bet he would probably like to do some raping.

Luther Lansfeld · « **Reply #1019 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:27:53 AM »

Yeah, it's hard to call it rape if you go down the rape tunnel, at least to me.

Jo'ou Ranbu · « **Reply #1020 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:30:48 AM »

In that sense, probably. On the other hand, there is something unsettling about even creating a "device" of that nature, and in a way that I struggle to see as indubitably legal.

Anthony Edward Stark · « **Reply #1021 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:32:25 AM »

Quote from: Ciato on October 15, 2009, 02:27:53 AM

Yeah, it's hard to call it rape if you go down the rape tunnel, at least to me.

I believe once the person has decided they have had enough rape, it becomes actual rape.

Luther Lansfeld · « **Reply #1022 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:45:53 AM »

Which can be after the fact when you think "Hmm, I wonder how much money I can get out of this clown."

Jo'ou Ranbu · « **Reply #1023 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:54:17 AM »

Considering he's a performing artist, I'd wager they'd probably have more luck extracting sea water from a snow globe.

NotMiki · « **Reply #1024 on:** October 15, 2009, 02:54:55 AM »

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/gop_uses_work_of_intern_spy_to_accuse_muslim_group.php

Cross-pollinating from Misc. Links: see, having a beard can help you get a job...spying on Muslim political groups!

News:

Author Topic: Idiot of the Day (Read 254339 times)