Author Topic: NBA 2007-2008  (Read 21314 times)

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2008, 12:15:29 AM »
I have begun my E-mail campaign of the Toronto Raptors, trying to get them to update their logos to include feathers, keeping in line with the modern scientific consensus. I invite anyone in here remotely interested in doing so to join me.

Actually, I invite EVERYONE to. It takes maybe 5 minutes and it'd be really nifty if I could actually pull off a switch like that.

Feathers aren't badass looking enough... besides since when do NBA teams actually care about being factual?  If shit like that mattered then teams like L.A. would have changed their names when the cities moved.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #26 on: January 27, 2008, 02:13:11 AM »
Their current logo is like an angry Barney. Feathers would make them MUCH more badass.

In my letter, I phrased it so that, as they're a young, intelligently built team, they should change their logo to show how they're on the cutting edge.

"Lakers" were NBA's first champions. It'd be a shame to see the name die. LOGOS though... those can always change.

http://www.amonline.net.au/chinese_dinosaurs/feathered_dinosaurs/photo04.htm

^That looks pretty damned badass to me.

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2008, 08:08:07 AM »
Okay I give, that is many times more badass than their current logo.

Also, 10 dollars richer!  I said Lakers would go 1-3 in their games against Phoenix, Denver, Mavs, and I think Spurs.  A friend told me I was stupid and said they'd win at least 2, so he even gave me 0-4 on the bet.  Turns out I didn't need it, they went 1-3 as expected, and I can now begin my "Lakers need Bynum" laughter!

And boo Portland losing at home.  I suppose every Blazer outside of Roy shooting awful will do that though.

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2008, 04:12:43 AM »
http://aol.nba.com/features/expertpredictions_071030.html

Found this humerous, preseason predictions.  Most aren't bad, I mean guessing every division winner can be tough.  John Hareas from NBA.com deserves to lose his fucking job though.

Nets, Bulls, Heat, Nuggets, Suns, Spurs.

Nets- Their team changed practically zero, and they have a knack for injuries/underachieving.  Anyone who thought that the Nets could compete with Boston this year is simply dumb.  Hell, I'd pick Toronto over the Nets.
Bulls- This pick has logic behind it, in fact a lot of the guys picked it, but Detroit is the proven team and the Cavs are the current East champs.  I din't get the Chicago love, although I will admit I thought they'd be at .500 at least.
Miami- Shaq always gets injured, I don't even think Lakers were number 1 seed in most of their NBA title runs(?)  Wade also gets hurt a lot, and even if he didn't, he can't lead a team to a division win.  Again, didn't expect 9-34, but a conference win was ridiculous.
Nuggets- That's a legit choice I suppose, although they're currently a superclose third in what is now the most up in the air division.
Also, it was one of only two choices in the division, sooo.
Suns- Only one he's right on so far, and it's the DUH pick of the year.  Lakers/Warriors were sposed to be good, but not regular season Suns good.
Spurs- Another third place team!  NOK came outta nowhere, but still.

This guys current picks are 3/5, 4/5, 5/5, 3/5, 1/5, 3/5.  In other words, he would have picked BETTER if he had randomly thrown darts at the names of NBA teams.  Fire this moron please nba.com.

For what it's worth I picked Boston, Detroit, Washington, Utah, Phoenix, Dallas to win their division.  Currently 1,1,2,1,1,2.  Can I have a job at nba.com?  In fact, my picks are better than EVERY one of those guys who wanna have sex with Pat Riley and Ben Wallace.


BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2008, 09:12:09 PM »
Quad posting!

Gasol to the Lakers for jack shit.  I am not quite sure why Memphis did this, but this makes the Lakers a serious threat assuming Gasol can stay injury free and Bynum comes back strong.

Shit.  Although, this further cements my "Kobe needs a big man to win" theory.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #30 on: February 01, 2008, 10:08:49 PM »
Who cares?! Pau Gasol gets to be on TV again!

In reality ~ I guess they're devoted to building around Gay and Conley. They're probably just gonna start tanking now. The parity in the league this year is enormous. Memphis can't claim to be "Right on the bubble". They're in the "Bad teams" heap. I don't like tanking much, but this was probably a move to Jettison a current star they can't seem to build around, and likely get another couple of players. (Hilariously, they get Pau's brother in the deal.)

They clearly needed to do something to get good again, and they probably figured that they wouldn't and just nuked the team.

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2008, 02:37:14 AM »
But to the Lakers...  Kobe might get out of the first round of the playoffs in his post Shaq era now, although the West is evil enough it's no sure thing.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #32 on: February 13, 2008, 10:27:14 PM »
Fuck Dallas I'm a Blazers fan now.

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #33 on: February 14, 2008, 10:13:41 PM »
It's a good long term decision.  Aside from maybe Utah, Portland has the brighest future for the next decade or so.

Anthony Edward Stark

  • Is that... Alcohol?
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4347
    • View Profile
    • Modern Drunkard Magazine
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #34 on: February 15, 2008, 11:41:20 AM »
I believe an appropriate reaction as a Portland native would be "Oh you better fucking believe it."

Course, Roy's been gone and he's really stepped up as the leader of the team, so we're missing him. It kinda shows.

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #35 on: February 15, 2008, 02:05:52 PM »
Portland is obviously trying to get 9th in the West so that they can pull a miracle number 1 pick out of their asses!

On a random note, I was at the front desk of a bowling alley last Thursday and Oden came in.  Kinda weird since they played Detroit that Friday, but I guess he doesn't travel with the team.  The man is HUGE, he was also wearing these funky shoes that added like 3 inches to his height, I'm assuming they were some kind of special shoe.

I can say that this was the first and probably only time in century that I've been next to someone a foot taller than me.  Also, former Blazer Cliff Robinson bowls in a league at that alley at 9PM (which is what time it was), but as far as I could tell they didn't talk.  (Cliff is a piddly 6'10, he's only got 8 inches on me.)

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2008, 03:00:32 PM »
Halfway through All-Star weekend, so I guess it's time for MID SEASON AWARDS. >Fanfare<

Let's start with the big one:
MOST VALUABLE PLAYER
Lebron James, Cleveland
Anyone interested in seeing a man's statline? How's this beast? 30, 8, and 7. I knew LeBron was good. I knew he was really good. I even knew he was really, really good. But I haven't been paying attention to Cleveland. I know their record is good. But I never actually sat down and looked at the numbers until recently. The man also averages over two steals and a block a game. I hate this. He's younger than I am, but like, 3000 times as manly. This is why he gets the MVP award.
(My preseason prediction: Kevin Garnett)

MOST IMPROVED PLAYER
Chris Kaman, Los Angeles (Clippers)
I badly wanted to give this award to Turk, but Kaman's stat increase is pretty ridiculous. Something like six points and eight rebounds in only about 7 extra minutes. He went from an overhyped starting sidekick to Elton Brand and wound up being some kind of 16 and 13 guy. Lots of dorks cream themselves over 20 and 10 guys. I say getting close to fifteen in both is sort of averaging it down to the same thing. The question is, "How much will Kaman fall off when Brand is actually on the court?"
(My preseason prediction: I honestly can't remember. I think it might have been Rudy Gay.)

ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
Al Horford, Atlanta
Kevin Durant shoots like, .400. Horford, meanwhile, essentially averages a double-double. That's pretty damn impressive as a rookie. Since I haven't seen too many of the rookies play this year. The rookie challenge showed me that Sean Williams is really talented, too, but he's kind of a dick.
(My preseason prediction: Al Thornton. In my defense, if the Clippers played him as much in the early season as they've been lately, he'd be winning this.)

SIXTH MAN OF THE YEAR
Manu Ginobili, San Antonio
GINOBILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!
No, seriously. I'm not sure why he comes off the bench or how exactly that works, but this guy would start on any team in the league. There is no team that has a good enough 1-2 backcourt to not start Manu Ginobili. And yet, he comes off the bench. This award is his as long as he wants it. (Honorable mention: James Posey)
(My preseason prediction: Manu Ginobili)

DEFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE YEAR
Marcus Camby, Denver
I guess. I haven't seen too many games with big defensive beasties. Aside from James Posey and Devin Harris. Who are both excellent, excellent defenders. Camby, however, has a monster 11 defensive rebounds a game and close to 4 blocks, though, so I guess he can damn well take this again.
(My preseason prediction: Marcus Camby.)

COACH OF THE YEAR
Byron Scott, New Orleans
Last year the Hornets were injured and still almost made the playoffs. I'm pretty savvy, you know. I thought, "There's no way this team doesn't make the playoffs this year." and I predicted they'd get in at a pretty damn high spot. Like, 5 or 6 in the west. And that Byron Scott would win coach of the year pretty undeservedly, because it was really his players all being healthy. Well, the Hornets are trading #1 in the West back and fourth with Phoenix. That's like, 4 or 5 spots higher than I thought they'd be. So Mr. Scott, I was wrong. You DO deserve that award.
(My preseason prediction: Byron Scott, but I maligned him anyhow. Also, somewhere in there, I said "If Indiana can keep this up, Jim O'brian deserves the award. Indiana did not keep it up.)

and finally
EXECUTIVE OF THE YEAR
Mitch Kupchak, Los Angeles (I need a "What the Christ?!" emoticon.)
Kupchak?! What?! Well, Danny Ainge (WHAT?!) has a strong case for turning the Celtics around from (near)worst to first. But what FUTURE do the Celtics have? With the Pau Gasol trade, Kupchak keeps the Lakers in strong contention for like, five, six, seven years. I can't argue with that. The Gasol trade was just the coup de grace. No executive can say "Well I'll do you one better". They can't.
(My preseason prediction: I can't remember if it were Danny Ainge or Kevin Pritchard. No way in hell did I say "You know who needs to win Executive of the year? Mitch fucking Kupchak." Even when I forgot to take my meds and almost died (not really), I wasn't THAT crazy.)

Kilgamayan

  • Celluloid Hero
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1059
  • Never feels any pain, never really dies
    • View Profile
    • This is the state to which I have been reduced.
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #37 on: March 02, 2008, 04:26:00 PM »
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/

Quote
Wally Szczerbiak's wife Shannon gave birth to son Maximus Jack (8 lbs., 20 inches) on Saturday in New York.

Maximus Jack.

I wish that was my name. :(


[22:28:39] <Edible> Mafia would be a much easier game if we were playing "spot the asshole"

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #38 on: March 03, 2008, 12:37:07 AM »
MAX. JACK. SZCZERBIAK. It sounds like music. I love you, Wally.

Since I missed this last week, it's time for yet another team-by-team analysis:

ATLANTA HAWKS ~ Hey, it's Mike Bibby! Hahahaha, you traded for Mike fucking Bibby. I maintain these guys needed to make a run at someone like Calderon next year, or do something to get Andre Miller (Miller would be the perfect point guard for this team. Think of all those lobs being thrown at Smith, Childress, Williams, Horford, et al.) They didn't give up much good for Bibby, though. Hooray for possibly making the playoffs and losing immediately, fucking yourself out of a high draft pick?

BOSTON CELTICS ~ Are showing some wear-and-tear. Again, they sort of need their starting 5 to be healthy, (And Posey, too). It's hard to say whether or not that'll actually happen, but it helps an awful lot. I don't think they'll win a championship this year. (Hahaha Boston Sports fans) I hear they're signing Sam Cassel, and I could have sworn they signed a big guy (PJ Brown? I thought he retired), but I could be crazy. Both would help the team a lot.

CHARLOTTE BOBCATS ~ So...... they go from starting McInnis over the more talented Felton to cutting him? What the fuck? Their coach is really terrible. I hope someone notices how bad he's doing, because Charlotte could snag a playoff spot in the weak east. Damn it, this team has potential. (And lots of money, still. Shame no big name player wants to play in Charlotte.)

CHICAGO BULLS ~ I sort of like their trade for Hughes and Gooden. Gooden is, in theory, a post player, and Hughes is, in theory, a slasher. I mean, in practice, neither guy actually does either of those things, but they honest-to-goodness TRIED to fill two holes with one move. This also probably sends a clear message to Ben Gordon. It reads "Dear Ben, We love you and think you're a terrific sixth man, but we're giving our money to Deng. Hope you understand XOXO John Paxson."

CLEVELAND CAVALIERS ~ I -really- like their trade to get rid of Hughes and Gooden (Who suck) to get Delonte West, and Wally World, who don't. Delonte is a great fit for Cleveland, because he's a reasonably sized guard who can shoot, and let LeBron do most of the ballhandling. Szczerbiak is likely the most talented guy LeBron has played with. (There's Boozer, but Cleveland Boozer was a different Boozer). On a different note, a friend and I had a discussion on Cleveland: Why isn't LeBron simply the point guard? Not a point forward, or whatever nonsense. He should be the actual point guard. He's an athletic freak of nature, and unlike Dwyane Wade, can actually make the passes he throws and has great court vision. Seriously. LeBron could be the next Magic Johnson if they put him at the point. Get a big, tough shooting guard, and who can the other team defend with their dinky little 6'2 point man? No one.
EDIT: I didn't mention Ben Wallace in my first draft. I should have. Ben Wallace is playing like Ben Wallace again. No offense, but his D is good, and he works WELL with Ilgauskas. I'm glad to see Ben doing well on a team again. Cleveland's commitment to defense is a good chance for him to shine. What's Cleveland gonna do? Score less points?)

DALLAS MAVERICKS ~ For now, the Jason Kidd trade seems to be working for them, but I maintain that this was a shitty move and I'll be shocked if they win more than one playoff series this year. I don't think they'll do it, and I hate Jason Kidd. I really do. He can't shoot worth shit, and he's a gigantic asshole. I don't even want him on the Olympic team. I am offended that this wife-beating schmuck represents my country. (I don't care if Kobe's a rapist or not, though. Kobe can do whatever the fuck he wants. Why, why did you get injured, Kobe? ;_; )

DENVER NUGGETS ~ I feel so bad for Allen Iverson. He tries so hard to be traded out of his shitty team, and he winds up on a good team in a better conference. And now he's probably not going to make the playoffs this year, or if he does, he'll be out in the first round. The guy can't get on a winning team. Denver..... eh. They need to play defense. Outside of Marcus Camby. At the beginning of the year, they were actually doing a decent job with that, but they fell off. If ever a team needed to make a gamble on Ron Artest, it was this one. As it stands? Meh. They're going nowhere. Blow it up.

DETROIT PISTONS ~ Were, until recently, my pick for 2008 NBA Champions. I'll get to my new favorite pick later. It took most of the season, but I finally unseated the Pistons at the top. That said, I still really like the Pistons. I love that they trust their youth finally. I love how they trust Stuckey so much they just told Flip Murray to bugger off. They have a deep, excellently crafted team, and I look forward to years of my local team being in excellent condition.

GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS ~ Hahahaha. You signed Chris Webber. Did they use their massive trade exception from Charlotte to do that? What a waste. I like Golden State. Unlike Denver, who I feel is plummeting fast in a great conference, I think Golden State will get better by virtue of some young guys getting better (including guys they don't even play. I'm still big on Bellinelli, but he has no D) and the other big west teams (Namely Houston, San Antonio, Phoenix, and Dallas) getting worse in the next few years. I wouldn't mind being a Golden State fan right now. (And I kind of am!)

HOUSTON ROCKETS ~ Have won a couple without Yao! I hope they enjoy their first round playoff exit. I feel terrible about Yao. He's so dedicated, he wants to play in the Olympics even though it might ruin his career. And that's good, because his country would probably force him anyhow, because he's like, the Crown Jewel of China. I wish you luck, Yao. You're a pretty damn cool guy.

INDIANA PACERS ~ FINISH THEM. Seriously, they were good at the beginning of the year. It's crazy to see numbers this good out of Mike Dunleavy Jr. I say they need to "blow up" the team, by which I mean trade Jermaine O'neal for the first package of cool young studs they can at the draft. Trade him ANYWHERE for young guys. The Coach, Granger, and Dunleavy is a good start. Stick with it, Indiana.

LA CLIPPERS ~ Even in the intensively good West, this is a team that's really underperformed this year, and Injuries was a huge part of that. I'm glad someone talked sense into the owner that this was not Mike Dunleavy Sr.'s fault. I hope they can keep Brand next season. I wonder if Livingston will come back, maybe as a small forward or shooting guard. It's a good thing that he had such size, because if he loses a step or two, he can still play a little. But his career very well could be over. Thornton is FANTASTIC as I said he would be, and that's a great piece to have for the future. I like the Clippers, and I think when they're not ravaged by injuries, they can be an impressive force. Imagine this team with yet another high draft pick. They should go for someone else who's got 3 or 4 years of college, like Thornton. Push it, LA

LA LAKERS ~ My new pick to win the NBA Championship. The Pau Gasol deal wasn't necessarily a fleecing, because I think Memphis technically got what they wanted, but it was a magnificent deal for the Lakers. This team is freakishly good. And I love watching them play. Bynum doesn't even need to come back at full efficiency for this team to jump up yet another level, either. That's a really scary thought for the rest of the NBA. Make no mistake: The Lakers are definitely going to be the team to beat this season, and for my money, probably the next few seasons to come, too. I would not be surprised if Kobe retired with a few more rings than Shaq.

MEMPHIS GRIZZLIES ~ Have been known to have a starting front court of KWAME BROWN and DARKO MILICIC.

MIAMI HEAT ~ I'm reasonably sure that, if they were in the West, they would be mathematically eliminated from playoff contention. I like the deal for Marion. He's young and athletic and might not hate being on the same team as Wade where he can argue over being the best player or not. Of course, he eats up a lot of money. If they can get someone like Calderon in the offseason, they could be right back in it with Wade/Marion/High Draft Pick/Good point guard. They also need a center, I guess.

MILWAUKEE BUCKS ~ Yeah, I dunno what they're doing either.

MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES ~ Quietly, Al Jefferson is averaging 21 and 11. So he really isn't that bad to build around right now. I wish I had a better idea of what Foye was doing, but they have some reasonable pieces. I'd love to see who they draft in the next couple of years. With the top teams getting old very quickly, it's not inconceivable to see Minnesota turn it around. But.... it will take time.

NEW JERSEY NETS ~ I love Devin Harris. I'm such a fanboy. I dunno why exactly. He's up there on the list of "NBA Guys I might actually by a jersey for", but in his case, it's because I look good in purple. Anyhow. He's the main piece in the Kidd deal, and Diop/Krstic/Jefferson/Carter/Harris is actually a pretty impressive starting five. Sean Williams is really talented, but might have an attitude problem. I say give the kid the benefit of the doubt. He could be solid goddamn gold if he works at it, and I say the bank he can make from being gold will motivate him. I also think he really, really likes winning. I think this team is going to start winning. Let's draft some young guys who have legit experience and see what happens. Getting rid of Kid was a good move, because this team is up-and-coming, and having a young guy (and probably the best defensive guard in the league, no less) come in is a great way to push that message.

NEW ORLEANS HORNETS ~ I wonder who they'll eventually replace Peja with. For now, he's absolutely a good thing for the Hornets, but the rest of their team is really young. This team is surprisingly great this year, and I suspect that they'll stick around in the "Elite Western teams" category for quite some time. If they play their cards right, they could contend for a title basically every year. Yeah, they're in New Orleans (for now), but I think when teams really open their eyes to Paul and Chandler this post-season, they'll start to think "You know... I want to play with those guys". Or at least, "You know, if they give me money, I'd be OK playing on that team".

NEW YORK KNICKS ~ LOL.

ORLANDO MAGIC ~ Turk got snubbed for an all-star selection this season THREE FUCKING TIMES. That's bullshit. Total goddamn absolute bullshit garbage. I'm glad they didn't trade Redick, because, yes, I think they're actually gonna use him sometime in the future. They have a lot of other guys that, right now they should probably play over him. They've been playing Dooling more, which is good, because Jameer fucking Nelson is awful and I'm glad they realized that. Arroyo is better, but Dooling is probably the best point guard fit for the team right now. The trade with LA surprisingly didn't suck for them, but boy, howdy did it do wonders for LA. God, I forgot Ariza was even ON the Lakers (he's injured). They have Trevor fucking Ariza in edition to everything else they have. That's wrong. That's flat out wrong. How can that team NOT compete for a title for the next five years? But this is about the Magic: They're OK. Really. In the east, this is a fine place to be. They have enough juice to at least compete with the Pistons and Cavs and Celtics, and that's all you can ask for. They have as decent of a shot as you can expect right now of competing for a title, but I don't think they'll win it. Still, they COULD represent the East and I wouldn't be overly shocked.

PHILADELPHIA 76ers ~ Hey, they might make the playoffs! Hahaha at the Eastern Conference. Hahaha at Philadelphia missing a good draft pick which they desperately, desperately need. Do they have cap space even? Or does Dalembert eat all that? In all seriousness, if they DID have the money to get a good free agent (Small forward?) this year, they might be in reasonable shape, but I can't bring myself to like this team. I dunno what the IDEA is behind the Sixers, so I can't get behind 'em.

PHOENIX SUNS ~ Hahaha you traded for Shaq. Well, Shaq is definitely motivated, though, and he's been playing better than he's been playing in Miami this year, but they gave up an awful lot for him, and they have nothing..... NO FUTURE when him and Nash finish up. They have to win now (they won't. LA will beat them. San Antonio will beat them. New Orleans will beat them.) or they won't see a championship in this town for at least twenty years. (Seriously, though, Shaq is pretty bright and when he figures out the offense, they might be kinda decent. I get why they made the gamble, and I'm OK with the gamble. I hate how they have no young talent, though. That's going to cripple their future. Their medical staff is the best in the game, and they MIGHT gas Shaq up enough to make a good run at it, but I just think LA is better. Still, I can't fault them for the trade, and it'll be nice to see Shaq retire on a competitive team instead of a crappy one. And, unlike the previous two years, I wouldn't be -that- shocked if they won a title.)

PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS ~ It was sad to see them fall off, but in a way, this is a good thing for Portland. They do very well in the draft, probably better than any team lately. (Maybe not Detroit) They'll get Oden next year. They'll get another good young player (or four) next year. They'll probably trade some of their superfluous young guys for yet another talented player. Portland is built extremely well, and they accomplished something big this year, even if they miss the playoffs (which now seems likely). They have made a clear message to the rest of the NBA. It reads "We are coming." They'll be right there as soon as NEXT year, and they'll be a major player in the West for a long, long time. If they can keep building as smart as they have been building, they can even outlast the Lakers, who are set for at least half a decade. The Eagle-Eye decade is going to be a very good decade to be a Portland fan.

SACREMENTO KINGS ~ Good on you, blowing up your team. Or starting to. You'll get there. I dunno if I like what you got from Atlanta, but it's a start. Now ship out Miller while people still think the 20-20 game might not have been a fluke.

SAN ANTONIO SPURS ~ Shame they had to give up Elson, but Kurt Thomas really IS a good defensive player, and apparently Barry is coming right back to SA. So the Spurs are probably, yet again, right in the hunt for the title. This is really a remarkable team, and they HAVE to build for now instead of the future. I'm really interested to see if they can build around Parker when the time comes. They work as intelligently as any office in the league, but I'm just not that crazy about Tony Parker. Can he headline a team? Can they draft Tim Duncan's David Robinson's Tim Duncan before Tim Duncan retires? AFTER Tim Duncan retires? (I like saying "Tim Duncan")

OKLAHOMA CITY BANDITOS ~ Well, that's what I'm gonna suggest they name the team after it moves and the city of Seattle successfully keeps the rights to their legacy. It's probably considered racially offensive though, so I'll have to come up with some other cool-sounding name that has a great ring with Oklahoma City, has a Southwestern flair, and also subtly points out that they're GIGANTIC THIEVES. This is my project after my feathered Raptor project. I think if both the Raptors change logo, AND I successfully name Oklahoma's team, I can weasel my way into a cushy analyst's job. Somehow. Hey, I can dream. (Also, DAMN that's a lot of young draft picks they have. Let's make some noise, "Seattle". Draft some guys, I guess.)

TORONTO RAPTORS ~ I like the Raptors. I hope TJ Ford doesn't die. Calderon is better than I thought, and I already thought he could start on most teams in the league. I feel bad for Bargnani, and I still think he could possibly develop into something special. And I will come right out and say it. I am still one of those guys who believes he can be the next Dirk. Yes, Dirk matured a bit faster, but comparing their rookie numbers, they're really not that different I suspect Andrea might make the leap on a different year than Dirk did. Bargs needs to keep at it, and hey, if he only manages to turn into the next Joe Smith, there are plenty of teams that'll still love to have him.

UTAH JAZZ ~ See why I like Kyle Korver? And yes, actually, he DID turn the team around. Averaging more threes per game than a team you're being traded to did before you got there generally spells "Success" for both you and the team when you arrive. Utah is a pretty damn good team, but they feel sort of like the West's answer to Orlando, as far as talent goes. Sure, it wouldn't be a real shock if they came out on top of the West, but I wouldn't bet money on it. (Actually, I'd be more likely to bet money on it. I bet people undervalue Utah and Orlando. You could make some serious bank on a bet like that. But most realities will have LA and Detroit coming out here.) Also worth noting is that they're pretty young and should be mildly successful for years to come.

WASHINGTON WIZARDS ~ Aaaaaaand Butler goes down. Son of a bitch. I feel so bad for the Wizards. This is a good team, damn you. It's a good team! Well, at least Blatche and Young look all right. Hopefully, because the East is pretty soft for the time being, they can ease themselves into the future without much lost effort. This is sort of a "Wild Card", team. It's really hard to evaluate just how good they are, because they keep getting bad injuries to really amazing players. On the other hand, they have decent options off their bench, and quite a lot of youthful talent, and even their main stars (Sans Jamison) are quite young, themselves. So at least they won't wind up like the Rockets anytime soon.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You may have noticed me say once or twice that I want teams to draft experienced players. And I'm deadly serious about that. Draft players who know what the hell they're doing. Seriously. Do it. Not all of you.

Look, for someone like Seattle or Minnesota, or Memphis, it's PERFECTLY OK to grab a raw, unwashed talent in the draft pool. You should. Pick up the most talented guy you can and hope you can polish him up. Memphis is probably pleased as punch with Rudy Gay right now. And they should be. Seattle will love Durant if/when he learns how to shoot, and I'm already a fan of Jeff Green. Indiana, Sacremento, Denver, if you're gonna rebuild (And you either ARE rebuilding or SHOULD rebuild) go with the young guys. It's the smart thing to do. Take any great talent you can. Just keep picking up guys who have the most talent and hope you can grow 'em. Build a stable of young studs and then start thinking about trades and options. It really doesn't take as long as you may think.

Now, everyone other team who's not reading my basketball rant on an RPG Board. (Not EVERY other team.) But let's say the really good teams. The old teams. Or even the young teams that are right there. Teams that are trying to make the playoffs but aren't quite in it yet. Or ARE in the playoffs but not winning. This is directed at Golden State, at Toronto, at New Jersey, at Atlanta, at Charlotte, at Washington. Stop taking young guys. Stop it. You have enough young guys. Take older guys. Atlanta, I knew you got burned on Law IV, but you're really fantastically stupid for thinking he was a good fit for your system. You're even dumber for picking up Bibby, who, in his heyday was what Law IV's best case scenario was like (Not really. Bibby is better), and also doesn't fit your system. Take the experienced player. If any one of you schmucks (And admittedly, many of you didn't have a shot to) had drafted Thornton, you'd either be in the playoffs or competing for a better spot. (Atlanta, not you again. Actually, you guys just got screwed this year outside of Horford. But good job in taking Horford.) Older Players actually know what the hell they're doing. They can contribute immediately. They can contribute, and this may shock you, BIG, immediately. Start looking at them. Give them a long, hard look. Think about why Josh Howard was an All-Star, and why Tayshaun Prince is always mentioned as a possible all-star, or whatever. There's one just about every year. A four-year guy who might not be the best potential player in the draft, but he can play RIGHT NOW. And get this, they're still really young and still often develop into better players. Take the older guy. Hell, TAKE A SOPHOMORE. Stop taking untested Freshmen. What if they happened to be the only good player on their team? What if their point guard was better than you thought he was? What if their year was a fluke?! Most importantly, why are you still gambling and speculating on young talent when you have the materials to build a good team NOW. Pull the trigger on a damn trade, draft a guy who actually knows what the hell they're doing, and make some noise in the playoffs. Rebuilding STOPS when you actually BUILD SOMETHING. Now do it.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2008, 12:43:36 AM by Veryslightlymad »

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #39 on: March 03, 2008, 02:16:42 AM »
I read VSM's, maybe he'll read my version of it all!

ATLANTA HAWKS- Will barely miss Play-offs, which is a good thing for them this year, since going just means a worse draft pick.  Childress is actually improving, making him a good threat off the bench, Al looks solid too.  The problem is Joe Johnson.  A go to guy who shoots 40% even is bad!  Try and trade him for a GOOD guard, make a good draft, and enjoy having a shot in the East.

BOSTON CELTICS- If their starting 5 are healthy come playoff time, I think Boston wins it all.  If they have even 1 injury though... they could have some serious issues.  Only time will tell!

CHARLOTTE BOBCATS- I pay no attention to this team at all... umm Felton needs to stop underachieving?

CHICAGO BULLS- Get a good coach.  Bulls should be good, but for some reason fail.  When this happens I rightfully or wrongfully blame the coach!

CLEVELAND CAVALIERS- Wally is decent, Wallace is decent, but it still comes down to Lebron having to do too much.  He's fucking amazing, but not quite God.  I do like Super's idea of putting Lebron at PG, but I still think Cleveland isn't a legitimate contended.  They are basically guranteed to play Toronto in first round, and I see Raptors winning that.

DALLAS MAVERICKS- Pulled a Phoenix and went for the win now.  Kidd is HIGHLY overrated... OMG A PG WHO REBOUNDS.  Okay, so he gets 5 more boards than most PGs, but he also gets more Turnovers, Less points, less shooting % BY FAR than a normal PG.  Still, for the next year or two he is better than Harris.  That said, Dallas won't win title in next year or two, so that trade fucked them.

DENVER NUGGETS- Relying on two high scoring players with bad shooting percentages is damn risky.  If AI/Melo catch fire the team is basically unbeatable, but hoping for those two to get hot at the same time, and the right time, is... probably not happening.  Props to Camby for being awesome though.

DETROIT PISTONS ~ Still see them losing to a healthy Boston in playoffs.  If Boston isn't healthy then Detroit vs Orlando should decide who goes to finals.  (I'm rooting for Orlando, although 6-7/10 times I see Pistons winning the series.)

GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS ~ They need to do something to get better... they're going to be the Blazers of the late 90s as they stand now.  (Go to playoffs every year and lose in first round!)

HOUSTON ROCKETS ~ Might squeek out 8 seed without Yao, will proceed to get stomped by whoever.  It really sucks too because Yao is a likeable guy.

INDIANA PACERS ~ Blah blah trade JO etc..

LA CLIPPERS ~ Blah blah need Elton to be healthy for a year.  That way, they can suck WITH him and finally realize that this team is never going anwyhere.

LA LAKERS ~ Getting a FREE ALL-STAR is fucking bullshit.  Lakers are scary good now.  My new dream in life is for them to get 1 seed and Portland to get 8 seed since Portland seems to match up well.  GOGO upset.  (Odds on fav. to win title right now.)

MEMPHIS GRIZZLIES ~ LOL.

MIAMI HEAT ~ They need a big man.  Marion/Wade is a scary combo, but teams that lack MJ NEED a good PF/C to win.

MILWAUKEE BUCKS ~ Yeah, I dunno what they're doing either. (Not changing what VSM said at all.)

MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES ~ This team actualy might have a future.  Telfair is still super young and could continue to improvie. (Remember, Nash did nothing his first 3 years in NBA and he didn't even come out of HS.)  Al is solid if he could work on shot selection.  Wolves need to use their draft to get a good pick, hope their young guys develop, and then things might turn around for them.

NEW JERSEY NETS ~ Harris/Kidd was a bad deal... for the next 2 years.  Harris will continue to improve whereas Kidd will not.  Still, this team also seems to fail despite having good players.  If Harris doesn't turn things around in a year or two then find a new coach!

NEW ORLEANS HORNETS ~ If I lived in NO, I'd go to EVERY FUCKING GAME.  Seriously, this team is actually BETTER ON THE ROAD. 19-8 vs 20-10.  I blame their NBA worst attendance, and everyone in NO should get kicked for not going to games.  Still... as good as this team is, I think they need 1 more key player somewhere along the line to contend for title.

NEW YORK KNICKS ~ LOL.  GET A NEW FUCKING COACH.

ORLANDO MAGIC ~ Yeah Turk proly did get snubbed. Umm... if Boston has injuries going into playoffs, Orlando has a chance at representing East in finals.  They won't win against any of West's good teams though.

PHILADELPHIA 76ers ~ Cheeks is doing a damn good thing with a shitty team.  Sadly... that is bad in the long term.  76ers have a sorry future if they continue to keep being an 8 seed.

PHOENIX SUNS ~ Umm... they need to upset Lakers and win a title this year.  Shaq for Marion was STUPID in the long run.

PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS ~ Obviously I'm a fanboy, but this is the team of the future in the NBA barring more Oden injuries.  If Jack can just get more consistant then Portland with have a better starting 5 than Pistons did in their title year.  That is scary.

SACREMENTO KINGS ~ Rebuild, pray.

SAN ANTONIO SPURS ~ Same team as always.  Might squeek out 1 more title before Duncan gets too old, but seems doubtful.

OKLAHOMA CITY BANDITOS ~ Ha ha awesome VSM.  Durant/Green not enough to help this team.  They needto suck for 2 more years and try and get good drafts.

TORONTO RAPTORS ~ Toronto COULD be a fun sleeper.  I think they can take Cleveland in round 1.  If Boston loses 1 of big 3 I think they can take Boston in round 2.  They're not as good as Magic/Pistons, but upsets happen!  I like this team and I think they'll be even better next year.

UTAH JAZZ ~ Utah and Portland are the teams of the 2010s.  Got better with Korver and Boozer/Deron gonna only get better.  Might want to try and grab 1 more solid started and this team will be a title contender.

WASHINGTON WIZARDS ~ Worst luck team in NBA.

BaconForTheSoul

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 664
  • Because you don't get her with 3 levels left.
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #40 on: March 06, 2008, 01:46:16 AM »
Kobe is going to win the MVP and I am going to cry.  James is averaing more points, more rebounds, more assists, more blocks, same steals, and he shoots a higher FG%.  All Kobe has is a high FT%.

However, the Lakers are first in the West, whereas the Cavs are fighting for 4th in the East.  Normally I'd say this means Kobe is the MVP except for the fact that KOBE HAS A FUCKING TEAM.  Seriously this is the dick sucking that people do for Kobe.

"Kobe led Lakers crown Kings"
"Kobe Bryant led with 34-points and triggered a 14-0 run midway through the fourth quarter to help send the Lakers to a 117-105 road win over the Kings. Pau Gasol added 31-points and 10 boards."
"Kobe, Lakers tough it out, knock down Kings"

These were the headlines on NBA.com, Lakers site, ESPN.com after their win Tuesday.  Kobe gets the credit in 2/3, and in the third he is mentioned before Gasol.  Now look at their lines

Assists:  KB 3  Gasol 4
Rebounds:  KB10  Gasol 10
Points: KB 34   Gasol 31
Steals: KB 2  Gasol 2
Blocks: KB 0  Gasol 2
Turnovers: KB 4  Gasol 3
Fouls: KB 3  Gasol 2
FT:  KB 14-16  Gasol 11-13

Comparable games right?  FUCK THAT.
SHOOTING KB: 10-26  Gasol 10-15.  Kobe Bryant shoots 38% from the field, Gasol shoots 67%.  Bryants takes ELEVEN more shots and makes the same fucking amount.  Now tell me how the fuck Kobe "Led" the Lakers to that win.  His awful shooting is why Sacramento led most of the game.  Despite that all that matters is his 34 points on AWFUL efficiency.

Kobe is the same damn player he's been for the last half decade.  The only difference this year is Bynum became a stud, got injured (they went 2-3) and then they pick up a freaking All-Star for free and start winning again.

Without Kobe, Lakers probably still go to the playoffs in the West. (Assuming no other injuries.)  If you disagree with that, you can at very least agree that they'd have a freebie playoff spot in East.
Without Lebron, Cleveland DOESN'T go to the playoffs in the fucking East.

Despite Gasol having a better game, Kobe gets hype.  Despite Lebron having a better season, Kobe gets hype.  Despite AI outscoring Kobe careerwise (same rookie year,) Kobe is the one who is known as the biggest offensive threat out there.

/end overhypedkoberant



hinode

  • Enough expository banter! Now we fight like men!
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1352
  • And ladies! And ladies who dress like men!
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #41 on: March 06, 2008, 07:40:46 PM »
Quote
ATLANTA HAWKS ~ Hey, it's Mike Bibby! Hahahaha, you traded for Mike fucking Bibby. I maintain these guys needed to make a run at someone like Calderon next year, or do something to get Andre Miller (Miller would be the perfect point guard for this team. Think of all those lobs being thrown at Smith, Childress, Williams, Horford, et al.) They didn't give up much good for Bibby, though. Hooray for possibly making the playoffs and losing immediately, fucking yourself out of a high draft pick?

Thing is, Phoenix gets their draft pick this year due to the Joe Johnson trade.  They have almost nothing to lose on making a playoff "push" in this year's east.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #42 on: March 06, 2008, 09:30:02 PM »
Noted. I guess tanking would be out of the question.

My point stands that Bibby is a bad fit for that team.

NotMiki

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4476
  • Social Justice McNinja
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #43 on: March 06, 2008, 11:54:43 PM »
Speaking of good fits, welcome to the Celtics, Sam Cassell.  Yeah, somehow they trade for a guy who actually raises their average age (prompting the Boston Globe to make the somehow-credible claim that the Celtics are favored by gerontologists).
Rocky: you do know what an A-bomb is, right?
Bullwinkle: A-bomb is what some people call our show!
Rocky: I don't think that's very funny...
Bullwinkle: Neither do they, apparently!

Anthony Edward Stark

  • Is that... Alcohol?
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4347
    • View Profile
    • Modern Drunkard Magazine
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #44 on: March 08, 2008, 09:45:48 AM »
I'm just gonna say, Brandon Roy? The new Clyde Drexler. Not just because he's a great player who has stepped up and taken the leadership of Portland on the court in a way nobody has really done since the Glide, but because he's a great guy off the court. Currently my favorite player in the NBA. I can't wait to see how he plays when Oden gets better.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #45 on: March 08, 2008, 09:48:28 AM »
I'm convinced Portland is happily setting themselves up to be a major powerhouse for at least a decade. Brandon Roy is electric. Truly one of my favorite players to watch when he gets going.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #46 on: March 23, 2008, 06:33:51 AM »
I didn't make any note of it, but the Bucks fired Larry Harris recently.

This is a good move for the Bucks, because, I mean, if you look at all my comments on the team recently, you'll see notes like "What is this team doing?" "What is this team trying to do?" "This team is making poor trades" and other comments generally questioning the direction of the franchise.

There IS talent on the Bucks. They had more but got rid of it. The Bucks shouldn't suck. They had pieces. Say whatever you want about the old Sixers' GM, or the Hawks GM (In his defense, Atlanta's ownership dispute means practically nothing can be done for the team) or whoever. Kupchak and Danny Ainge probably redeemed themselves this past year. No one disputes that Kevin McHale is the worst GM. But I'd have to think Larry Harris is right up there. (I'd argue whoever GMs Cleveland is near as bad, too) This is a franchise that has repeatedly had the opportunity to be something special, and it's pretty much always been squandered. I'd like to see them install someone who can bring some punch to this team.

Hint: They need a swingman to compliment Michael Redd. Preferably someone who slashes to the basket. They have Mason here, and he's perfect. Assuming this was 2004. Which it is not.

They also need someone competent to back up Bogut. On a related note, I'm not sure either Villanueva or Yi is a good compliment to Bogut at all in the Power Forward spot. Bogut is decent on the boards, but Charlie V and the Chinaman are far from it. They need a legit big, tough body up there with him, even if he's coming off the bench. I'd trade Villanueva, honestly. Well, I'd go back in time and not trade Ford for Villanueva, spinal terrors and all.

In other words, they need a slasher, and two decent big guys, one to back up Bogut and one to play WITH Bogut. If they could get a rugged 3/4 guy like Andres Nocioni (Should go after someone else, though), that'd be fantastic. The Bucks are soft as hell.

I can't stress this enough, even. Bogut is a terrific passer. If he had someone big up front who WASN'T some kooky perimeter player, or at least some high energy guy who made aggressive cuts to the basket, he could find them. A soft-handed big man with a great eye for passing doesn't need a partner who shoots threes. He needs a midrange shooter who can spot openings to the basket and take them. Someone like a Ronny Turiaf is exactly what this team needs with Bogut. Note that Turiaf, too, is a perimeter player, but he cuts to the basket hard when you need him to. He wouldn't be the solid rebounder they ought to add to their team, but unlike Villanueva, and certainly unlike Yi, he does some important things like defend and cut to the goddamn basket. And he's got a lot of enthusiasm, which the milquetoast Bucks sorely, sorely lack. They're listless.

I've gone on long diatribes about how trading Ford was a bad idea, but Mo Williams is a fine point guard, especially on a team like Milwaukee that needs his extra scoring punch. He's like a somewhat worse version of Chauncey Billups. Milwaukee can make the playoffs with him being the main guy, but they're gonna need a backup for him, too. Running the ball through Redd does work to a degree, but they need a legit playmaker to step off the bench for them and give them a few minutes.

I see no reason why they can't acquire, if nothing else, a duct-tape quick-fix version of these guys and make a run at the playoffs. They've got a mix of old and young guys, I say dink around with the roster until it has some semblance of balance and then make a run for it. Why not? Worry about getting to the playoffs, or at least getting competitive before you start worrying about getting a Championship. You can't sit around waiting for a Boston deal, because you're not going to get one, even though Redd is a great player, and I'm sure there are lots of guys who want to play with him. I think it's realistic to say the Bucks could make the playoffs NEXT SEASON without considerable work, and this is a team that has a shit-ton of problems. What they DO have, however, is a legit all-star caliber player in Redd, a legit scoring point guard in Williams, and a fine young big man in Andrew Bogut. Everything else about their team is terrible, but any of those three guys could start on a playoff caliber team. That's way the hell more than a legitimately terrible team has. It's more than some playoff-BOUND teams like Philadelphia have. They have attractive pieces like Charlie Villanueva, who is probably still perceived as fairly valuable, and if they just admitted that he's a terrible fit for their team, they might be able to get something decent for him. They have fine draft position this season, and I want to say they're still one of the few teams that's under the Salary Cap.

MAKE NO MISTAKE, a competent GM, that is to say, pretty much anyone other than Larry goddamn Harris, could turn this team around almost instantly. It shouldn't take many moves, and the Bucks have more flexibility and a sturdier core of players than most teams in the league, or at least their conference. There is no reason for this team to not make the playoffs next year. I will be paying particular attention to the franchise and who they decide to bring in.

Veryslightlymad

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION [Challenging: Success]
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1141
  • Shitposts are a type of art for webforums
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #47 on: April 12, 2008, 04:19:07 AM »
Well, the Playoffs are just about here, and with Golden State's loss yesterday, we more or less know exactly what the teams going in will be, even if Golden State technically has yet to be mathematically eliminated.

So, in the spirit of my long diatribe about Milwaukee, I've got a BRAND NEW SEGMENT for my half-baked NBA analysis.

And now....

VSM FIXES YOUR DUMBASS TEAM
....With Veryslightlymad

Miami Heat

Miami is actually in fairly great position. They have an excellent shot at getting the number one or the number two pick this year (I think they should take Rose regardless, but if they take Beasley, I can't really fault 'em for it.) Dwyane Wade should be not injured next year, Shawn Marion doesn't seem stupid enough to opt out (probably) and likely is OK with being on a team where he's not the number 3 guy. He can also play his natural SF position. Miami also has Udonis Haslem, who I consider a fairly strong asset. I don't much care for the team personally, but I should give them some credit with what they've put together. The riffraff they've been running at the end of the season won't all be bad players, and they probably ARE evaluating their fairly weak bench to a degree. I think some of these kids might not be bad second stringers. They also have 3/5s of a strong starting lineup with Wade, Marion, and Haslem, and obviously, if they get Rose, they'll finally be set at the point, too. I don't quite expect them to be playoff bound next year, but if they were, I wouldn't be too surprised. I'm pretty darned sure, however, that they'll improve enough to convince Wade that the team is going to turn around fairly quick, and keep him in the burgundy for quite some time.
Or they could draft Beasley and get an excellent player, but flounder for a little longer because, really, who the fuck is going to play the point? Wade should never, ever ever be a point guard. He commits sinful amounts of turnovers, even if he CAN get a lot of assists, too. All in all, though, Beasley is clearly not a stupid pick. Assuming they get in the top of the draft, they're in excellent position, and even if they get stuck at 3 or 4, they're not -too- bad off. They have a much more solid core than their record shows.

The Team Formerly Known as the Seattle Supersonics
Well, they won't make the playoffs next year. Most of what they need to do is get Kevin Durant to EAT something and hit the weights. I'm vaguely sure I have thicker arms than this kid, and I weigh in at 125 pounds. He's got to get stronger. He definitely has talent and heart, which is a good thing, and I truly dig Jeff Green, so I like the start of this youth movement, so far. They have to put together a core. They ALSO need to draft a great point guard, and it's a shame there's only one Rose to go around. Still, there are a couple of other serviceable point-men in the draft, and that's what I'd start with. They have three picks, and I wouldn't be surprised if they kept jettisoning players and wound up with four or five. They have committed themselves to going young, and I'm guessing that they're going to keep going in that direction. For now, this is a fine strategy. Eventually, though, they have to make a move for a player who knows what the hell he's doing, or they'll likely flounder. Still, for this next season and probably the one after it, they can and probably should just keep taking whatever guy looks exciting in the draft, and pretty soon they'll have some options.
So.... I can't fault them for what they're doing, nor do I think I'll hate them after this offseason. The only thing I really think I'd do different is I would not move to fucking Oklahoma City.

Minnesota Timberwolves
Now these guys, should they win the draft, should take Beasley. I might be stupid, but I'd continue to work with Telfair. He's really given the Wolves more than they probably thought they'd get for him, because he's a two or three time loser. He needs to work on his shooting, but his passing skills aren't too shabby, and some consistency is what this kid needs.
The big problem they may find if they take Beasley, is they would have a really undersized frontcourt. Jefferson is pretty damned amazing for a guy his size in his position, but he gets blocked a fuck-ton, and it's not hard to see that his size is a big part of the problem. Having Beasley up there with him could make them a midget team that's fairly easy to control. Ryan Gomes is more of the same. This team really doesn't have many great options. Their only real shining point right now is Al Jefferson, so they're gonna have to find a way to work with him. Other than that, they're pretty terrible. You can't blow the team up, because it's already been blown up. So they have to make it with what they have now, and that's not going to make the playoffs. They have to painstakingly grow something here. This is why I think they need to keep Telfair. The kid DOES have some skills, but he's been very slow to mature and show them. Randy Foye has some potential, too. They're not going to be on the receiving end of a deal like the one they made with Boston, so they have to do things the hard way. They will need the draft for the next several years, because I don't think they have anything to work with. They are especially bad off being in the west. They have less to work with than "Seattle", but the same principle applies. They're stuck with having to put together a team from scratch. They need to target front court help for Jefferson, and they need a better bench.

Memphis Grizzlies
This team has Cap Space! Nearly 13 million for next year. (Based on the current cap. That'll change some). So they have options that other teams don't, in that, if they wanted to, they could pursue some free agents next year. Unfortunately, the coming free agency market is not exactly good. (I think, of the players likely to consider switching teams, Corey Maggette is the best thing out there. And no slight on Maggette, he's got some mad skills, but he's not going to be "The guy" on your franchise. Plus Memphis has Rudy Gay.)
Can Conley run this team? I think they have to take the answer as "Yes" and hope like hell that he'll improve from this year's performance. For now, they need to focus on building around Gay, because their only other really good player is Mike Miller, and they definitely can't start a team around him. I would give serious consideration to trading him for some size that is not Darko Milicic or Kwame fucking Brown.
Size is what Memphis needs more than anything, looking at their roster. They really have nothing reliable as a big, or as a big guard. Nothing. Their entire guard situation is a bunch of shrimps, and Darko and Kwame are not the front court of the future. Size size size. Rebounding. Big, burly guards who play defense. They need to do anything they can to get these things in the draft, and if I were them, I'd hoard my money and make a run at someone in the free agency market next year. I dunno who, but there's no reason to go crazy with spending on this year's lackluster free agency. They need another year to evaluate Mike Conley and Javaris Crittenden and I guess Juan Carlos Navarro. Kyle Lowry, too. The shrimps. The tiny, tiny men who are still giants compared to me.
I'm not sure who would be willing to part with a really good big man, but a trade package of Mike Conley and Jason Collins (a 6 million dollar expiring contract) would almost certainly make any team's mouth water. The problem with this scenario, is it almost certainly forces Memphis to take on some bad contracts and kill their cap space. Also, there just aren't too many good big men out there that I could see a team readily parting with save the idiots in New York, and... they're idiots. Letting Collins' contract expire would give them an amount of cash that could do pretty much anything they wanted, so they're in excellent position for two years from now. Next year, I'd sign some short-term contracts and accept that I'd have a terrible team. Hopefully they could win the next draft.
If they win THIS draft, they almost certainly have to take Rose, because he has the much-needed SIZE that Beasley sort of lacks. That means Conley is free to be traded and added to the asset list with Miller and Collins and all that gorgeous money.
To summarize, Memphis has an ass-ton of options, but no real core outside of Rudy Gay. That's not going to have a team "identity" and it's not going to get it done next year. Even if they luck out and score big in the draft. My advice to the Grizzlies is "Wait and see". They're almost certainly going to get something tantalizing in this next draft. They have to pick someone, see how they and Gay play together, and fill in the gaps from there. They more or less have to keep Darko, too, and hey, there's way worse. If Memphis makes a huge deal, I would expect them to do it in midseason next year. Their goal is to put together a core, and despite their enormous flexibility, they have such a fragile base that I don't know how they'll do it yet. They MUST wait and see.

Los Angeles Clippers
They need a point guard. I sincerely doubt Livingston is coming back as a point, and that assumes he comes back at all. I hope he does, because it's terrible seeing an injury like that.
I think they more or less have to resign Corey Maggette, and they have to hope Elton Brand is good on his word and chooses to stick around next year. Al Thornton was a savvy pickup for them, so they actually have one hell of a decent core. Kaman, Brand, Thornton, and Maggette. Bringing guys like Mobley off the bench. That's actually a hell of a team. The only significant deficit they have right now is at Point Guard. If it weren't for Brand and Livingston's injuries, I honestly think they'd be right there in the West with everyone else. It's almost scary to consider how many good teams are in the west. Especially with Portland AND Sacremento looking like they're going to be coming up. It's insanity. I couldn't tell you who was going to fall off next year.
Once again, this is a team that needs to draft Rose, if they win it. No slights on Beasley, but they got his position fucking COVERED. They need a point guard who can play immediately... uh... immediately. Luckily for LA, they have a bunch of capable point guards at their spot in the draft. Probably. And there's a few that they can trade down for. Yeah, they're the dreaded "Combo" guards, and I was originally going to say this was a bad thing for the Clippers, but then I remembered that Cassel and Livingston were combo guards, and they very nearly won the West with those two and the same lineup two years ago. And the pass-first guys like Dickau and Brevin Knight? Boy, they have not really worked for LA. The Clippers in their hey-day, if I recall, were sort of like a slowed-down version of Dallas. They are simply not a team that gets many assists. They are going to kill their opponents with isos and having some seriously stacked players for one-on-one. So yeah. A combo guard, or a good defensive guard, that's exactly what they need.
LA, if you miss on the lottery, draft Russel Westbrook. He's both. And, having gone to a local school, he could actually draw people to watch Clipper games. Seriously. Westbrook is hands down the perfect draft choice for the Clippers. He helps solve three problems the team has. (DISCLAIMER: I don't actually follow college ball too closely, I mostly go by reading draft reports on the various players. It could be that this is too high for Westbrook, but at least one site that has him on the board at all has him at about this level. Even if it's a reach, I think it's the right one.)

New York Fire Isiahs
FIRE ISIAH.
I'm not even gonna bother cleaning up this spill. Fire Isiah. Let Donnie Walsh do whatever the fuck he wants. Get back to me in a year. There is probably nothing you can do to make this a scummier team. You might make the RECORD worse, but not the future. You currently have no future. You have looked into the abyss and the abyss is looking also into you. Pray. (Hang onto David Lee. OVERPAY him when the time comes. I am advocating making a silly move, because you owe this kid for fucking up his future. Assuming you ever become a respectable franchise, you damn well better have Lee on it. Make Lee harder to pull away from you than Charlton Heston's guns, which I hear have only recently been pried from his hands. (Too soon?))

Milwaukee Bucks
Already discussed. Get somebody who'll work well with Bogut. That, or get Charlie V to stay in the post, because apparently, he's actually been doing shit down there (rebounding!) for the past few games. If he can be convinced this is his job, you are actually in FANTASTIC shape, because then all you need is a wing. It's a shame they probably won't have the money to go after Maggette, but if they somehow do, for the love of god, go after Corey Maggette. Maggette is the sort of rugged slashing player that they need to pair up with Michael Redd. Draft a big guy. Beasley if you win. Get Maggette. I don't care how. Just do it. Whoever gets Maggette between you and the Clippers is officially the smarter team. You both kinda need the guy. If Yi improves in the offseason, you're in even MORE fantastic shape. This team better make the goddamn playoffs next year. Consider setting yourselves up to trade Williams to the Clips, because they will almost certainly want him. You want him too, but if you had your hands on Maggette, you might be able to get away with drafting a combo guard, because hey, there's way more of them in the league than rugged slashers like Maggette. So go get him.

Charlotte Bobcats
GET. SOME. FUCKING. SIZE. Your front court is so very, very brittle. Okafor is fine, but he needs some damn help. Felton is absolutely capable of running an NBA team. Richardson and Wallace are both freakishly good in different ways. You have most of the pieces already, but you need someone to hang out up front with Okafor who is not made of glass. Hey, I like Sean May, too, for the 10 games he plays a season. You draft Beasley and like it if you win. Otherwise, size size size. You need a front court. (Actually, Nazr has been healthy for most games, but you need more than just Nazr.)
You will officially be over the cap next year, because you need to re-sign Okafor, and holy shit, you're paying Matt Carol five and a half million dollars a year. I actually really like Matt Carol, but he's taking up a fuck-ton of your salary.
I repeat: Get some size. You're in fantastic shape! Stay healthy somehow, and you will be FINE.
Felton will need a competent backup, too. (For the love of god, start him at point. FIRE your coach if he moves him to SG again.) Make sure you get one. Your bench is a little thin. Your core is way better than most teams could hope for, so just keep at it. You are almost there.

Chicago Bulls
If you win the draft, draft Beasley.
If you do not win the draft, draft Kevin Love. Trade down if you feel this is a reach. Love is a good fit for your team. He has legit post moves, but he's not very athletic. He makes up for it by having decent passing skills. HEY, you have two super-athletic, long-armed PF/Cs you can pair with him. Ta-DA. I solved your goddamn stupid "We don't have a post presence" problem. Fuck Drew Gooden.

New Jersey Nets
You're not in bad shape! Krstic needs to be healthy. Your starting lineup looks to be Harris/Carter/Jefferson/Krstic/Diop, which is fine.
Actually, when I see your cap space and expiring contracts, I come to the horrifying conclusion that you need to do some spending if you want to keep that core. You need Krstic, so go get him. Diop is less important, but you probably want him too. Boki Nachbar is a fine addition to your bench. So.... you don't have a lot of options. If you get a great offer for Vince Carter, you should probably take it. Otherwise, there's not a lot you can conceivably do with the cap situation. (Although, you seem to have a trade exception from trading Kidd. That will help a bunch.)
Somehow, you have Keith Van Horn signed for three whole years. I didn't think you needed to sign him for more than one. If you get Van Horn out of retirement, he might actually help strengthen your bench. Otherwise, congratulations! You officially have four million dollars of dead weight.
Take the best kid you can get in the draft, or the most NBA ready kid you can in the draft. Try again next year.

Indiana Pacers
Uhhh................
I'd trade Jermaine if I could, but good luck finding a team that'd nuke itself to take on an overpaid player who will probably leave the next year anyhow. Granger is good, you have finally gotten production from Dunleavy, which is good. You're stuck with Jermaine for now, but if he doesn't break himself again, he'll at least be productive. Holy shit, Dunleavy and Murphy have hilariously bad contracts. WOW.
I get the feeling you stuck with the worse executive. Your cap space is really abysmal, but there's really nothing you can do about it with Dunleavy and Murphy AND Jermaine taking up some sick space. Those guys combine for nearly forty million dollars. It's VERY good for you that you managed to squeeze some production out of Dunleavy, because goooooooood luck finding someone else to take him. He is now a building block for your team, and part of your core. No matter what.
So you have Granger and Dunleavy. You have a mix of old guys that aren't going anywhere, and young guys who will either improve -slightly- more or are about what you're stuck with. Luckily, they're not too bad. You must take the best available player in the draft and hopefully add him to your core. O'neal comes off the books next year, so there's only a little more time left in the horrible red zone. The bad news? Granger is up for his contract at the same time.
In other words, your money is going to be very sparse for the next few years, barring some kind of trade miracle that would probably also nuke your team. So take whoever you can get at any position. Just take the guy that your scouts agree is the best available player. Eventually the pressure will come off, and when it does, you should have a stockpile of talented young guys in the yellow and gray. It could be worse.

Hey, the Atlanta Hawks are currently in the playoffs
Tough noogies.
Get this: You need a center. That's it. That's all you fucking need. Get one.
I was down on the Bibby trade, but for some reason, he's actually come back from the dead playing for your team, and I have no idea how that works. I pretty much wanted to turn you guys into what I hear the Philadelphia 76ers are, but what you are is apparently enough to reach the playoffs......... this year.
Next year, you absolutely must have a center up there paired with Horford. I dunno where the hell you plan on getting one. By the way, Horford was the best pick you've made in a long time. I give you tremendous props for that one.
You have some tough decisions to make with re-signing players. You might have to say goodbye to Josh Childress, which would be a shame for you, but probably a good thing for some team that might throw money at him. (Memphis? Milwaukee?) Your terrible ownership issues might make signing someone even harder.
Bibby comes off the books in two seasons. This would open up enough space to sign your guys, but you'll have to spend one year with the luxury tax. I can't see your owners letting you do this, but if they do, that might be the best choice.
Consider making a run at Ben Gordon if you can't keep Childress. I doubt you can get either, though.

Sacramento Kings
Biggest surprise of the season? Beno Udrih. That really helps your position. Unfortunately, now you need to pay him money.
Shareef and Brad Miller are eating up all your cap space, but somehow, I don't think it'd be entirely unfeasible to trade Miller to a team for either some more shiny young players to pair with your backcourt, or some much-needed relief. Congratulations on signing an EXCELLENT player in Kevin Martin to a contract that is not batshit insane. Spencer Hawes has been showing flashes, so that's 3/5s of a team right there.
You're stuck with Artest, but he still plays good defense, makes other people play good defense, and plays for a surprisingly affordable price, so hey, you currently have 4/5s of a good team. You seem to be doing good with keeping him in check. I think if there's a way to handle a "problem" player, it's to give him respect and space. Look at what the Warriors did with Stephen Jackson.
What you need is a bench, which means you have to either trade Miller for some bench players, because SOMEONE has to be crazy enough to want him, or you need to draft some more young guys. I would go for both. Your team is actually quite good, but you need to be better than good to win in the crazy west, at least for the time being. However, with Martin, Hawes, and hopefully Udrih locked up, you are in excellent shape for the future. My advice to you is the same as the last few guys. Take the best guy you can get and be patient.

Portland Trailblazers
Your GM is better at this than I am. I can give you no advice. By all appearances, you have a beautiful future, and I hope everything goes according to plan.

Golden State Warriors
You have to decide where you want to take your team. If you're happy just making the playoffs sometimes, you have pretty much the roster to do it with. If you want to compete for a championship, you are going to have to give your roster a long, hard look, and probably get rid of someone you really don't want to.
Unfortunately for you, you have a lot of players coming off the books next season, and you need to re-sign most of them to stay at even your current position. This doesn't give you much flexibility at all. You're probably going to need to go over the cap, and you still won't be competing for a championship.
Hopefully, some of your young guns evolve some more, because you will need all the help you can get. You need size, and I know that's not Nellie's style, but you need it anyhow. I don't know where you can get it, or who you could get to fit your team that way.
If you want to be an exciting franchise that your fans love and that you can market, then stand pat. You've already got that, and you'll probably continue to compete for the playoffs for as long as you keep this unit together. If you want something more, I'm afraid I can't help you, because as far as improving goes, you really don't have much leverage at all. This year, you will have to make a choice.

Anthony Edward Stark

  • Is that... Alcohol?
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4347
    • View Profile
    • Modern Drunkard Magazine
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #48 on: April 14, 2008, 10:05:53 PM »
Holy crap, I was wrong. The Blazers might finish at exactly .500. Thanks for the freebie, Dallas.

NotMiki

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4476
  • Social Justice McNinja
    • View Profile
Re: NBA 2007-2008
« Reply #49 on: April 17, 2008, 01:13:23 AM »
“As much as it hurts myself and my teammates to be going home tomorrow, we vow that this time next year this won’t be our last game,” said Pierce. “We’re going to the playoffs and we going to make some noise.”

- Paul Pierce, 1 year ago
Rocky: you do know what an A-bomb is, right?
Bullwinkle: A-bomb is what some people call our show!
Rocky: I don't think that's very funny...
Bullwinkle: Neither do they, apparently!