Defense: The case against me is that I am not taking strong stands, because my present mood is detached and inquisitive as opposed to gung-ho and aggressive. And that I do not know who to aim for. If my previous words did not do the trick, then there's little need to waste more now. So, I acknowledge them, say I disagree with that assessment, and move on. By the way, Ciato. There were only two votes on Delta when you posted. Where was your gusto?
Now, as to who I'm looking at, there's Ciato, Kilga, Bard, Delta, and Rat.
Delta is the one I'm least suspicious of, but... I can't help but feel that we're being played somehow. Regardless, low priority.
Ciato/Rat. These two... their posts read clean, but something about them is definatly pinging my scumdar.
Finally, Bard and Kilga.
Kilga doesn't have much going on until page 3. In fact, his only contribution to that point is claiming not to find rolefishing offensive. On page 3, argues that only town voted for Delta (something he himself did not do, is he telling us something?) and claims odds, despite it being more likely the scum would split their votes so the lynch would tell us nothing. Or, y'know, just go organically so long as one of their own isn't on the block. Or even do an early sacrifice to give townie cred to the remainder. Honestly, it feels more like Kilga's trying to direct our eyes somewhere where there may be nothing to find.
Bardiche has been covering for Delta, and that worries me. Has also attacked folks who've been harder on Delta before erupting when Alex answered a question as to why he disliked Bard. Best case.
##Unvote: Rat, ##Vote: Bardiche
Rat Edit: I explain things, it's what I do.
