Well, this is a fine how-do-you-do, right here. I turn my head for a few hours, and suddenly, ol' Neddy's on the chopping block.
I don't much care for guns, but I'm going to stick to the ones I have. People lurking are the most dangerous people. God gave us voices so we'd use 'em, provided we keep our language nice and clean. I don't really "get" the arguments against Crow, or the Queen. As for Khan, I pointed my ol' suspicious finger at him, so I don't see how you can say I didn't have anything to say about the guy. Personally, I think he has a lot of long-winded, droning speeches that go nowhere, which is fine and jim-dandy for church, but that man only worships himself.
I still think Excel is the best candidate for a lynch today, if only because her content has been erratic, sparse, and insubstantial. But it's not looking like we'll get a lynch that makes even a lick of sense. If it's between me and the Queen, well, suicide is a Sin.
##UNVOTE: Excel
##VOTE: Queen Elizabeth
Now, see, this 'ere's why I'm thinkin' you're not such a nice bloke. See, maybe you're thinkin' all this stuff, but when it comes to saying it you're tighter than the old geezer. And, well, honestly, I think you're just playin' us all for fools.
You say you've spoken out against that Khan bloke, well I've seen you do it, but just the once.
Now, the dooziest of our problems seems to be this Khan fella. On the one hand, he has a gosh-darned point about creating the first serious discussion, but on the other hand, I don't much care for the idea of someone trying to win us over by risking himself during an otherwise joke phase.
Not much of an attack, I think. And that was yer second post too! Hard to think of you as being hard on the guy when yer praisin' 'im at the same time as yer talkin' bad of 'im. But, mayhaps I'm wrong, maybe ye've been focused on 'im because ye've 'ad nothing bad to say of anyone else.
Well, that's a right interesting ac-cu-sation, coming from someone in the "Anglican" church. I wouldn't be too sure about you having much room to talk as far as "Content" goes. I may be showing my conservative side, but I just hadn't had much room to make a decision on. I've also had a heck of a lot more'ta say than Mr. Serling, or that fella from the orient.
That said, I'm not liking too much that the two quiet guys casually voted for Khan, and I'm sure not a fan of how the Robot boy is flailing about. I'll wrap my noggin around it for a few minutes and get back to everyone.
Yer third post has ya talking bad about that Serling bloke, and saying worse things about 'im and Miyagi than anything you've said bout anyone else all day. Then we get to your other posts and...
##VOTE: Mr. Miyagi
Now, I don't really have the stomach for this "calling for someone's death", but with innocent people being killed, I think it's time for desperate measures.
By my count, Excel, Miyagi, Yangus, and Sterling over there all had less actionable content than I did, and what bothers me more is that no one seems to be tossing any suspicion their way... ....and keeping it there. I want to see what happens when a little pressure is applied to one of these not-present nellies.
'ere you're just votin' for the sake of votin' for someone, and usin' the excuse of them not bein' 'ere so that you won't look bad from the doin' of it. And ye blame all four of the blokes you do for postin' less than you have, despite the most worthwhile thing you havin' had to say by now being that you think the blokes voting for Khan are being all sneaky like about it. The best that can be said is that yer at least holdin onto Serling and Miyagi. Not that you say a thing about that.
And in yer last post ye go on to say that all we should be expectin' from you is that you'll be looking at the blokes what don't talk much? When ye haven't been sayin much else to start with? 'ell, you switch over to that Excel skirt for no reasons I can see, and then in yer next post, you claim it's Khan and Excel ye've been after when your posts say it's been Miyagi and Sterling you've had your eye on.
Yer posts don't add up when you give yer reasons, and you talk so to hide the fact ye'r not tellin' us anything. I think we've got you fer certain, and I'll be right chuffed to see you 'ang for it.