Well, I'm simply vanilla town and I won't hang myself. That much is certain.
And yes, I do feel offended by silence. People ask questions to get answers, and whether you think they are scum or not, you are obliged to answer. I do consider myself, in fact, at the very least, a semi-rational townie, and if I genuinely fail to understand, and want to have something to respond to, then the response must come from your lips. In my eyes, these things are far from rhetorical, and furthermore, it's simply common courtesy. Silence provides no distinction between thinking whether a question is inherently silly, or whether it's something you can't answer, and cannot be considered an excuse for anything, really. Allows for no difference between, say, you and UK.
In fact, even if you think that your responses are impossible to refute, then you're going to have to second-check that assumption.
First of all,
##Unvote. Made the vote thinking there was a potential hole, but there's probably only one scum left from the looks of it. I'm sorry for being a bird-brain there.
I point out that it can be turned around, then you say my turnaround is useless because "it can go either way.
Soppy's play was a weaksauce attempt to tie himself to me, scumbuddies had to know this and would likely call him on it, but early, so it wouldn't have much effect, before it snowballed into a serious case.
It sounded more like a point against me rather than a turnaround. Likely is the word you seemed to use, but 'likely' means more probable. I simply don't think so, it should be 50-50 after what you raised.
That doesn't make arguing for my lynch any less scummy, since I am in fact town and scum would want me dead most of all.
Just as suspicious townies would want you dead thinking that you were scum. With only this alone, I doubt you can differentiate between scum knowing that you were cop trying to kill you, and town being concerned about you as suspicious. Unless you can raise the issue of tone and wording, this point can only be used as completeness' sake and frankly, doesn't tell us anything on it's own.
Strago didn't blatantly call out the NK as supposedly pointing to me as scum.
Just as you used 'likely' and 'who', I used 'pointing', which I meant 'very slightly and vaguely'.
---
Scumhunting point. Hm, you were second-last on Sopko's bandwagon and you merely agreed on Bardiche. Anyone awed by long posts can do that and quote a random part of text and what you could have done is to ask Bard questions directly. There were possibilities of concerns by others, such as Corwin, that the case was all LAL and not much more, and you could have done, for example, what Strago had done on page 13. Therefore, I had the reasons to say things about your scumhunting, you're simply not the example of it this game, and neither have I, but that's another matter.
I'll move back to Kiro.
##Vote: Kiro
