Now that is an interesting little tidbit to wake up to. It's certainly consistent with Yakko's behaviour since Day 3 began, as well as the fact that Cranbud has been acting somewhat shifty. I'd like exercise some caution at the moment, as false roleclaims have gotten us burned before. But I just can't see for the life of me why he'd want to. Assuming 5 scum, that'd leave them at 4 left, with 9 town. Stringing us along by trading 1 for 1 isn't a good deal for them, even if we assume that Yakko isn't their rolecop. Especially since it raises the question of why they wouldn't just quietly off Cranbud in the night.
So, that does make me inclined to believe Yakumo's claim. And given the number of investigative roles we have out there so far, this means that we probably don't have two rolecops. And... yeah. That paired with his out of nowhere defense of VSM, and his lack of action during the tie break, does make him look very bad.
I'll still wait to see what he says, but for now, I'm leaning towards Yakko.
Next up, a few more questions.
Fnorder, it's great that you're posting some more. But I'm curious as to why you made no mention of Shale in your list of people you had thoughts on. He was active during the morning after, and posted at the same time you did. As well, he was active and waffling during the crucial tie break stage, preferring to sit back and let Hatbot decide, rather than risk leaving a paper trail of his activities like a good townie should.
Shale, I think my main question for you that you haven't adressed yet is this. Why is it that, despite saying it's the job of town to leave a paper trail, that you were willing to let the final decision of who to be lynched remain in the hands of Hatbot, which is a fine way to get someone lynched without leaving any trail at all?