Tom, I appreciate that being tired is going to hamper how much you're able to do, but please don't just cherry pick random points and ignore the rest. I trust that when you do return in the morning you won't have the same trouble, but if you read 'A => B => C => D' but only actually read 'C => D' and reply with 'but C doesn't necessarily follow. What if notB?' there's not really much I can do but point you back to the start.
Rat had everything to gain and nothing to lose from being silent for an extra half hour or so. Once I'd flipped it would be impossible to unflip me, so at worst
Meeple would be flipped in addition to me, and without knowing the rulings I'd say at best
Meeple may have got to live on.
The bit on
Snow works from the basis of town
Xanth, at which point a theoretical scum
Snow would be looking at 'scummate with a cop claim backing him up' and sacrificial townsman to choose between, and he didn't jump on the latter.
Meeple/
Xanth/
Snow all scum is a mess and a half.
Don't wave away my logic for last night as 'who knows what scum could have been doing' when I'm demonstrating how nonsensical it would be for those actions. "Anything's possible" is just a good blanket justification for attacking any position. I patently did not expect to survive (who other than me could have hammered
Meeple under those claim circumstances and not been strung up themselves the next day? Unless you are making a ridiculous claim of
Meeple/
Xanth/
Rat all scum, there's no way this position was orchestrated), in which case you should be arguing that I was theoretically trying to sacrifice myself to save
Meeple, but my case is that if I was scum then I wouldn't have saved anything and would have gained nothing for it, with really obvious better alternatives available.
Deal with it head on and find an actual hole in it (there could be one! As much as I'd love this to convince people, my logic may easily have faltered somewhere), because so far you're just implying that you think I'm stupid as well as scum.
.
With
Strago's position changing again, I'm neatly down to
Ryogo,
Andy and
Excal.
Andy's pretty simple - I had a relatively positive read on him from early on, after which he's just not been around. Go figure I disagree with the strength he calls to me 'drawing a lot of attention to [his] very limited post time' (I haven't and simply won't let anything justify me not posting enough), but otherwise mostly find myself in agreement with his lines of thought. Just with little in total, the concern is simple.
A reread of
Ryogo does just seem to generate a weak 'gut' case on me, which was raised above other concerns, in particular those on
Meeple. Minor bonus points for being the first on me rather than being a train, but the shallowness of his presence and direction puts him second on my list. Funny how little there is to say there.
Excal just seemed to flip-flop his way through the first day. Checking his posts I was surprised when it went straight from 'I don't have opinions to clarify, it's too early' (
here) to 'lower the hammer' (
here), as his position by the time of the former was a little bit of metagaming and more gut. Had his final post of content (
here) gone out without the edits (in this case, had he posted before I got back) then I'd be far more suspicious on the grounds of it matching expected scum behaviour of trying to get the hammer to fall on me before I could get back to hammer
Meeple. Posting it
anyway with the edit tagged on at the very least confuses me, if not actually reassure me.
Would really like to hear from all three of them.
So yeah, my train involved three light prods and a nuke. I guess all of the normal arguing [on my case] I remember came from people who didn't actually vote for me.
That's me done for now, I think. Will be around for quite some time if someone needs me. Do tell if I'm steering too close to walls of text.