smodge...the roleclaim is fairly weak. Yeah, I know vanilla can be boring sometimes, but just the role, not the name? Not much push behind it to try and save yourself - seems more like a resignation. As per your voting style, that's what I've noticed - you seem to follow the same pattern each time and each game. Still...
Your comment about (post #95) "hold off my vote until i see something substantial" followed by "i switched my vote, i had less than 5 minutes to do it with a possible 8 hours to go before i got home, i didn't read over the thread, just checked the latest vote-count" does seem to conflict with yourself a bit. In fact, with the "instead i leave mine sitting on whoever looks the worst at the time regardless of whether i think the case is valid or not" comment that started the post that really, really looks like convoluted logic. If you hold off your votes until they make sense, why would you post without having a chance to read the topic? How could you find something substantial without re-reading the topic? There's a lot of contradiction there. You say you think logically and look for substantiation, then, despite whether you think there is logic in a case or not, you leave a vote there? I...
Yeah, that's pretty weird, no offense. Saying that you want to keep a vote on someone you feel has the best case is one thing, but keeping it on one person? That...that's stubborn. Tempted to vote you, but I'll wait for more comments if they come in first.
Dhyer: Your concern with me is that I haven't voted? Well, a serious vote. I do admit, I forgot to take the vote off Nitori when I posted my most recent post, so I can do that now. It is a counting vote, however - if you read my last post, you'll realize that. It almost seems like a random off remark on me because , but I can't fault that - I've made a total of 2 posts this topic so far (yay, rotation that's an hour+ drive away every fucking day!), and the only vote I had was a joke, so that's acceptable thought. Still...
##Unvote: NitoriTo Alex: Yeah, I can see how that would be difficult. I didn't want to make the rule right away, and I saw no comments that it had to be done in the first post, etc., just a post somewhere. Like I said, I was expecting to use it at the end, but I do see it, so I did it last post.
Wow. I suppose sexual innuendo doesn't count for this sake, but a little bit of conflagration strikes me as a bit odd. Reminds me of the South Park episode Go God Go!, where a whole bunch of otters and human atheists fought because Mr. Garrison had sex with a high ranking evolutionary studies official.
As for whatever else...
Ciato and Otter are both good players, with different styles. I really don't think either gave a smokescreen off, just some debate between townies.
Otherwise, I really am not getting a good read on much else that's happened throughout the day so far, which is...concerning to an extent. Andrew has been a bit quiet since the first outbreak, but he's back, so let's let him get to doing his thing before I make judgments. Don't think he's done anything wrong yet.
Dhyer...Corwin doing the evading of the rules thing could be a scum thing. I really don't see how that's not a possibility. He could be advised not to, or he could be advised to. It's an odd way to go about things, but what if it were designed to be an attention draw early on? It could make a good smokescreen for the first day if it gets out of hand., if people start picking at him. I don't think that's the case, but...eh, I don't think it's anything to go after. The theory's a bit out there, and the possibilities are fairly limited with it. I don't think it was a scum ploy, personally, and if it was, it failed miserably - we have other things going on for discussion day 1.
Zuh, I really, really can't get a feel for anyone else. This is ODD.
