Suzumiya took action and pursued a path that she may have believed to be correct. To denounce such actions as worrisome feels like the Jedi approach to any movement. The Jedi are idle, with only want to maintain their corrupt status quo.
You misrepresent the situation most unfairly, evil one. While far more may be said of her now, her first vote was of in pure jest - of no action and stepping down no path - yet threatened (not) much. To call such a frivolity positive is folly, from which I find myself simply repeating what I have already said.
Your inquiry seemed like good sport to begin with, but now I fear that you have let it become an issue to exclude all others, as you have made only a passing reference to Lightyear outside of this scope, and that reference itself has brought me to ponder, as it strikes as a delaying tactic to justify a future swap, as your current opinion is merely implied.
Cosgrove: more worried was I that the other votes in question were so shallow, but on recalling the order of discussion, it was not until after the
third vote fell that Suzumiya broke the boundary of mere irritation, which would indirectly shine better on Sherman... if he had returned since then.
Shaggy: it is a blessing indeed that we have found you in time, but it would be false for you to assume that you have free passage to the next round of discussion. I urge you to find the courage to speak your mind, as you have yet to do so.
With the destined time fast approaching I fear that we have still yet to make much progress, and I must now leave to defeat a horde of rampaging robotic vikings, leaving precious little time indeed. So:
Of those with votes, I would currently only lend my weight to that against Lightyear - as much as the complete lack of defence is perplexing - Crocker, for his narrow vision on an issue I cannot support (even if it is against an avatar of evil), and the avatar of evil Dooku himself has managed to leap up the list for similar reasons. By my return, however, a vote change may depend considerably on whether my eyes can discern anyone who has said much but still offered little, or has spoken little but offered even less. There are unfortunately several that this could yet apply to.
