Trying to keep this as succinct as possible, but sure, expansions wherever. Formatting here is Player A-Player B, where Player A is the player whose posts I'm sifting through at the time, and checking out what they say about Player B and vice versa.
Crocker-Shaggy: I can't read much into this connection, as they mostly didn't overlap. If anything, it's odd that for all of the talk of lurkers in his final post
here he didn't have anything to say about Shaggy. Otherwise yeah, just a note on the latter's absence here and there.In the other direction, there's just neoShaggy's one comment in support of the Crocker lynch under two other trains (that have since flipped town).
Crocker-Dooku: I'm not liking what I'm seeing here. Day 1 saw Crocker with an early vote for Dooku for pretty bad rationale, which he then took off incredibly tamely, and then prodded at Dooku again again a little at the start of day 2 without any conviction behind it, which bears all of the trademarks of forced scum-scum drama. On the flip side, Dooku refers to Crocker only in defence of the latters attack on him, and then in the post where he votes for him. I think I'd be all up for marking this down as bussing if not for it making absolutely no sort of sense for Dooku to be bussing him at that point as far as I can see, short of say achieving bafflement and safety now, but I still don't see anything short of Thanatos.
Crocker-Hank: Referred to several times in the context of his argument against Dooku but otherwise ignored until he complains about him being on his train for unoriginal reasons. Not really seeing it clearer than neutral with Crocker's chaotic style. The other way around, Hank didn't mention him at all until the start of day 2, whereupon he voted for him and stuck fast. Again, would have a really tough time seeing the scumminess in that play.
Crocker-Jack: is it impolite/cheeky to do this myself? He used me as part of his anti-Dooku platform and the more general 'people on the initial Miss Suzumiya train' angle in general in day one, then failed to butter me up when I stuck a vote down on him. In his finally post. he oddly OMGUSed both Hank and Crocker for voting for him, but not me. Possibly on grounds of activity? In reverse, I disliked him from mid day 1 (although lol, I must have been falling asleep when I wrote
this post - my discussion on Crocker just stopped midway and I don't think anyone pointed that out so I never finished it off then), but consciously stuck with Lightyear over him. This having failed, picked up and ran with the case from first thing day 2.
Crocker-Filburt: Mostly just skimmed this, but in short Crocker agreed with a fair amount that Filburt had to say while Filburt ragged on him a lot. That Filburt disappeared almost immediately after at least myself and Coop pointed out that his vote on Coop over Crocker was blown out of proportion and he should have been forced back onto Crocker should have been more telling, I guess.
Filburt-Shaggy: When Filburt shielded Crocker by voting Coop, he also shielded Shaggy somewhat. Ugh. That's basically the only communication they've had, given that Filburt and neoShaggy didn't overlap at all.
Filburt-Dooku: Crazily, only one reference to Dooku at all from Filburt, and that was part of his ealy argument against Crocker. And, uh, nothing from Dooku about Filburt either, given how single-minded his play has been for most of the game.
Filburt-Hank: Again, nothing from Filburt on Hank other than as part of the translation of Miss Suzumiya. And likewise nothing from Hank back on Filburt other than as part of drumming up activity.
Filburt-Jack: Got rather defensive after I pointed out his cheerleading of the Buzz train, after an earlier petty shot at me (air bag disguised as discussion building?) for my initial Suzumiya vote, although I did still have him placed as slightly town during day 1 other than the cheerleading for being active.
Okay, so this is taking far too long, and is already quite the WoT. Will be back to finish up in a handful of hours. Though my paranoia so far seems to be digging me towards Dooku based on this, my actual level-headed approach is still massively weighted against Shaggy being on some crazy final day gambit, and if it is Shaggy then it's not exactly greatly shocking that there wasn't much communication to glean information from.
Before I go I should address the most recent point from Shaggy that really struck me the wrong way that I mentioned before:
"The four people who voted Crocker are definitely the most townlike to me at this point, though there might be a slim possibility that the scum wanted to avoid all hoping onto a train to save one of their own, and so maybe there's a slim chance one of them was in on it, but that is much to WIFOM to think about at this point. Of the people who didn't vote Crocker, Sylvester strikes me as the most townlike of those that aren't me. I don't really fault Bender for his votes since I see the same sort of things in Shaggy, though his general lack of saying anything otherwise is worrisome."
I really don't know exactly what to make of this, but it looks odd to me for some reason.
Unjustified gut feel ahoy. "I don't like you and want to lynch you, but can't find good reasoning for it, so I'll just claim something feels wrong." Oh so very bad.