All right, here come the rebuttals. I'm going to be harsh and ask people to back up their assertions here - and if you can't, I would suggest that you reevaluate those assertions. In essence, I want people to sell me on why the tourney should be kept on the main site (and nostalgia, momentum, or tradition not really acceptable answers here), as I honestly do not see anything of value that it's bringing in at this point. I have no objections to it continuing to run in some form (such as on the forums), but the negatives are far outweighing the positives in regards to keeping it going outside that venue.
Super and others have stated that the tourney still brings in new people - I do not believe this is accurate, nor has been so for at least a couple of years. I would challenge you to provide me with at least two names of people that have joined up with the group in the last two years that came here SPECIFICALLY FOR THE TOURNAMENT - most of the newer faces I've seen found the site through searches for RPG stats or information in general, or forum games, or other sources. Those newer folks may participate in the tourney, but they didn't come here for it, and I don't think anyone has come here for it specifically in a very long time.
From a quick review, it appears that recent vote totals have been hovering around 65 votes a week (discounting some of the low totals for holiday weeks). How many votes of those would be lost if super did not specifically remind people to vote? The estimate I've heard is between 15 and 20 votes, and if a third of the voting base lacks enough interest to continue voting without that prompting, is it really holding people's attention?
Most people here have stated "I still like it" in regards to the tournament; while I appreciate the sentiment, and that's great, is that like really enough to continue putting the writers and editors through knotholes every week as they try to keep things going for the site? The notion of discontinuing results has been forwarded as a way to cut down on some of the burnout, but it's not going to solve the entire issue; from what I remember in talks with Tai and Snow the editing for the match writeups can be just as much a burnout-inducing drag - and if there are no writeups at all, what's the point of keeping things on the main site? I honestly don't see anything that's likely to reverse the trend of disinterest or burnout; the most you're going to see is the burnout getting moved around to other folks currently in the group until we run out of people willing to write or edit, and then we're at this exact same point again. I'd prefer to get the problem dealt with before it becomes an absolute necessity, and hopefully head off the possibility of people falling away from the group simply because they're sick of the work.
More on killing results. While I don't at all object to Sage halting the missing comments writeups (it's a herculean job, and he's done amazing work in keeping them going for this long), I also think that removing them is going to kill what little casual interest remains in the site. If you're not that big into the mechanics and stats, the results have been the one place where you could get a good chuckle - things like Magical Girl Ghaleon, Cooker 8, or the adventures of the pervert squad have been great amusement as they've come and gone, and I suspect some of those are as much responsible for holding some folks' interest as the voting or discussion of the matches themselves. With those gone, or massively reduced (as it sounds like the site might see a handful of results writeups per week at best), there's no extra hook towards keeping people here.
And finally, keeping the tourney on the main site has the drawback of keeping something -else- from being there. I'd love to see some of the creativity that's running around here get turned towards the problem of what to do with the site without the main tournament focus - I think it's something that can be solved, and still bring people in; I've suggested turning the stat topics into the site focus, as one idea, and I'm sure there are others that could be advanced. But as long as the tournament occupies top billing, it's easier for people to be complacent, go with the idea that "it's good enough", and let things continue on the slow downward slide they've been on for some time.
So there's your challenge: Don't tell me why we shouldn't kill the tourney; tell me why we should keep it.