Uh, possibly. The albums I like most are scattered all over their catalogue. The first (self-titled) album is consistently great, but also much closer to the symphonic prog you probably expected than what I've previously linked you to (the singer for the first two albums was Greg Lake, who went on to found the poster child for prog-rock pomposity: ELP. They also have lyrics by Pete Sinfield, who just never makes any goddamn sense and would also emigrate to ELP). The second album (In the Wake of Poseidon) is almost note-for-note patterned after the first, but since it is copying an outstanding thing it's still pretty good. I cannot comment on the third/fourth albums because I have not listened to them. Apparently they borrowed the singer from Yes for one of them which, well. I mean, I like Yes, but.
The mid-seventies records are probably the most recommendable stuff. Starless and Bible Black has Fracture and would therefore be outstanding even if the rest of it was forty minutes of dead air (fortunately it also has Lament and Night Watch. I'm of mixed opinions on the other songs, but generally don't give a damn because the standout songs are so excellent). Red is amazingly good even before considering the band was in the process of collapsing. All of this is much closer to the direction Fripp followed for the rest of his career than the first albums are, too.
Eighties revival onwards has Adrian Belew, which is awesome, but I've only checked out a couple of these records: Discipline (good) and The Power to Believe (great).
In any case, I'm still rather amazed you're asking the question.
~
Smashing Pumpkins: Blank Page
