Speaking of, it struck me that's what really bothers me about Randian stuff. It is very... indoctrinated? They worship the idea of the capitalist/inventor/whatever way more than the other side demonizes it.
It's a cult of sociopathy. Logic does not apply, only the allure of a "philosophy" that claims to justify the adherent's atavistic impulses.
Any person that references Ayn Rand in any positive sense can safely be set to Ignore.
I enjoy reading Ayn Rand's columns she wrote in the 1970s. She is an Internet ranter before the Internet, writing short, pithy, punchy, and unfair essays criticizing stuff she doesn't like and usually misrepresenting it.
I think Rand's thoughts on abortion are pretty spot-on, and I actually prefer to use libertarian arguments as the basis for a pro-choice position (rather than some rather uncomfortable alternatives).
Ayn Rand's "novel" writing is fun to criticize!
I find the split in Ayn Rand's followers between the ARI and the other Objectivist sets to be both amusing and useful, where it turns out you can build a cult that requires 100% obedience even around a philosophy theoretically based around free-thinking, idealism, and logic.
--
I await the Cideon's ignoral.