Quote from: The Daleks on July 20, 2015, 02:29:07 AMBut he won America's hearts.Didn't win EVO though.
But he won America's hearts.
It's okay. Gamers tend to stereotype based on labels. Everyone who generalizes based on labels is an asshole.
Quote from: Hunter Sopko on July 20, 2015, 03:35:11 AMIt's okay. Gamers tend to stereotype based on labels. Everyone who generalizes based on labels is an asshole.D'ya know, I TRY to tell people I'm an asshole and nobody ever believes me? Fuckin' optimists man.So I'm not sure if I actually want to real-talk this. It seems a bit much. But. In the past year I've come to feel that the culture around gamers, as a group, is unsalvageably toxic. That the mechanisms in play are self-reinforcing towards bigoted behavior and entitlement. And so the only Solution, then, is to destroy the culture and build anew. I can't really call myself a gamer anymore in good conscience, and hope others come to the same conclusion. And it's amazingly hypocritical of me because at the same time I know that the sorts of games I enjoy can't really exist with the emerging sub-subculture of games. So I buy games from companies that ultimately are going to fail and lament their loss even while simultaneously believing that their loss is necessary for a culture I used to claim to become something healthy and worthwhile.And yes this is the shit I think about when chat is too quiet and I get bored in the wee hours. Gotta hate yourself thoroughly.
Quote from: AndrewRogue on July 20, 2015, 03:24:21 AMQuote from: The Daleks on July 20, 2015, 02:29:07 AMBut he won America's hearts.Didn't win EVO though.Neither did the Americans!
I actually have logistic questions about that spoiler:1. Is there even any implication or reference to the world as we would recognize it or is it just thrown in from out of nowhere? If you reread, would there be things you would miss the first time that would be blatantly obvious the second time?2. Is there any true or cohesive attempt to create a scientific explanation that makes sense about how they world was able to change so much that upon initial review, there was literally nothing in common with Earth now?3. Do any maps ever given resemble Earth in any manner?
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/07/study-online-gaming-losers-are-more-likely-to-harass-women/Study demonstrates, in a limited context, that male FPS players treat female players worse depending how bad the male players are. Should be interesting to see what comes out of this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmMnJdDDoDMMy favorite match this EVO: Woshige vs. Nakamura, Xrd Millia mirror match
They won Mortal Kombat. Barely. Over a British guy. I think you have to be like 60 years old just to purchase Mortal Kombat in Britain.
http://www.twitch.tv/srkevo1/v/7919999Can start watching at the 20 minute mark. This wasn't the only example, but basically there's massive amounts of stalling/timeouts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IptvSQY9Qa8
Quote from: Lance on July 25, 2015, 12:36:09 AMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IptvSQY9Qa8Cute. But apparently when they say "Every JRPG Ever" they just mean "Final Fantasy IV and VII"...
To Be or Not To Be is the choose-your-own-path version of Hamlet, written by Ryan North (Marvel Comics, Adventure Time, Dinosaur Comics), William Shakespeare (Macbeth, Cymbeline, Hamlet too I guess), and you (all sorts of stuff!)You can play as Hamlet, Ophelia, or Hamlet's Dad, but if you choose him you die on the first page and have to play as a ghost investigating your own murder. It features over 100 different endings, each illustrated by one of the greatest artists working today, including Kate Beaton (Hark! A Vagrant), Andrew Hussie (MS Paint Adventures), and Noelle Stevenson (Nimona).If you want to stick to Shakespeare's original plot, helpful Yorick skulls mark the choices Shakespeare took. But why would you want to do that? Especially when, instead of a play-within-a-play, there's a choose-your-own-path book within a choose-your-own-path book.To be or not to be: that is the adventure.