Register

Author Topic: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew vs Pokemon - DAILY UPDATES!  (Read 50247 times)

Excal

  • Chibi Terror That Flaps in the Night
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2603
  • Let's Get Adorable
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #150 on: February 05, 2016, 08:20:47 PM »
Ladyba is adorable, Grefter.  Don't give me so much enmity it forges a new timeline.  That never ends well.

Cotigo

  • Jerkface
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4176
  • Yoo-hoo, Mr. Tentacle Guy...
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #151 on: February 06, 2016, 02:08:23 AM »

This is a doggy and you are a bad man. Plus it looks like his head fits perfectly in Magmar's.

Quote

She is way too sassy to be putting up with your shit, Grefter.

Fenrir

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2397
  • Social Justice Archer
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #152 on: February 06, 2016, 03:04:23 AM »
Yeah, I kinda agree. I don't think -any- generation of Pokemon is entirely worthless. Gen 2 has Girafarig, Miltank, Slugma at the very minimum for objectively good designs. According to canon

AndrewRogue

  • Infinite
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3079
  • Sadness
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #153 on: February 08, 2016, 06:12:18 AM »
Chikorita: I think, over time, my dislike of Chikorita has faded. Despite the stupid face (FFT wants its lack of noses back), the overall body is actually quite nice, along with the little ring of buds on its neck. That face is really fucking stupid though. 3/5

Bayleef: Hey, look. You look better with a snout. Who'da thunk it? Head leaf is awkwardly positioned (it should be a bit further back, I think) and the shift to yellow is not a plus, but I still like it marginally more than Chikorita. 3/5

Meganium: What is with the middle color of starters being different? Anyhow, pretty good plant dinosaur. The petal frill is the highlight of things, with the antennae being kinda the big minus. I get what they were going for (pistil and stamen or whatever), but eh. Still! A decent design. 4/5

Cyndaquil: Cyndaquil's head is really stupid looking. Which is a shame, because I like the body, the coloration, and the flameback. It's a fire pokemon that isn't red! But yeah, dumb anteater face. 3/5

Quilava: You know, I liked it better before I looked at the alternate sprites to get a better idea of it's back. It's haunch is kinda dumb and fat. Why does it not have legs? I'd also like it way more if the fire wasn't just head and ass. So it goes. Some pokemon get unlucky and I want to learn more. 3/5

Typhlosion: This whole line has this problem where I'm not really sure about the evolution line. We go from tiny anteater to weasel to dinosaur? Dunno, would have liked a clearer evolutionary line. Also, once more, why really limit the fire just to the neck? 3/5

: Totodile: Ugh. Why are we a little bipedal crocodile that can't shut our fucking mouths? I really shouldn't hate the design as much as I do, but it is so blocky and stout and awkward and immobile. Just ugh. 2/5

Croconaw: Holy crap. First 1/5 of the new gen and we're there early.

Feraligatr: Wow, I forgot how bad this design was. Nice spine. Nice random rectangles on your body. Just... geeze. Fucking hideous. Nice t-pose arms. I just can't stand this one. 1/5
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 06:17:47 AM by AndrewRogue »

Dark Holy Elf

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 8161
  • Well-behaved women seldom make history
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #154 on: February 08, 2016, 06:21:07 AM »
Gen 2 not the best, but Chikorita line is great. Meganium in particular is one of the few really good final evos for starters, which I'm generally not a big fan of.

Erwin Schrödinger will kill you like a cat in a box.
Maybe.

Grefter

  • Villain.
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 10386
  • True and Honest. Smarter. More aggressive.
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #155 on: February 08, 2016, 08:07:44 AM »
I think the Typhlosion is meant to be a Wolverine?

Also can we talk about how A) Feraligatr should be FRLGTR and B) looks straight up like some Five Nights at Freddie's stuff.
NO MORE POKEMON - Meeplelard.
The king perfect of the DL is and always will be Excal. - Superaielman
Don't worry, just jam it in anyway. - SirAlex
Gravellers are like, G-Unit - Trancey.

DjinnAndTonic

  • Genie and Potion with Alcoholic Undertones
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6942
  • "When you wish upon a bar~"
    • View Profile
    • RPGDL Wiki
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #156 on: February 08, 2016, 09:12:51 AM »
I always thought Quilava looked pretty cute - kind of a fire rodent with a spiky mane that just so happened to be fire, kind of like Ponyta's mane. Not a pokemon I'd argue over, but I feel like he could rank a 4/5.

The Totodile line has always been my least favorite of all the starters.

Grefter

  • Villain.
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 10386
  • True and Honest. Smarter. More aggressive.
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #157 on: February 08, 2016, 10:13:51 AM »
I thought you liked characters with arrows pointing down at their junk?

Quote

LADIES
NO MORE POKEMON - Meeplelard.
The king perfect of the DL is and always will be Excal. - Superaielman
Don't worry, just jam it in anyway. - SirAlex
Gravellers are like, G-Unit - Trancey.

DjinnAndTonic

  • Genie and Potion with Alcoholic Undertones
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6942
  • "When you wish upon a bar~"
    • View Profile
    • RPGDL Wiki
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #158 on: February 08, 2016, 10:23:50 AM »
There is clearly no junk, 0/10 do not want

Captain K

  • Ugly Old Man
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1210
  • Saving the world with curry and coffee
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #159 on: February 08, 2016, 12:04:25 PM »
He dissed Chikorita, this is already starting poorly.

Fenrir

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2397
  • Social Justice Archer
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #160 on: February 08, 2016, 12:57:18 PM »
Why is Baileef using psychic powers to make green French sticks hover around its neck
« Last Edit: February 08, 2016, 07:27:57 PM by Fenrir »

Dark Holy Elf

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 8161
  • Well-behaved women seldom make history
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #161 on: February 08, 2016, 06:05:56 PM »
Wouldn't you, if you could?

Erwin Schrödinger will kill you like a cat in a box.
Maybe.

Fenrir

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2397
  • Social Justice Archer
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #162 on: February 08, 2016, 07:19:28 PM »
Good point, but where are the floating rillettes and goat cheese?

Fenrir

  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 2397
  • Social Justice Archer
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #163 on: February 08, 2016, 07:56:33 PM »
Wouldn't you, if you could?

I should have mentioned that I already can, quite obviously


Dark Holy Elf

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 8161
  • Well-behaved women seldom make history
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #164 on: February 08, 2016, 08:01:06 PM »
Touche.

Erwin Schrödinger will kill you like a cat in a box.
Maybe.

AndrewRogue

  • Infinite
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3079
  • Sadness
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #165 on: February 08, 2016, 11:18:32 PM »
This is belated because, honestly, I really didn't want to waste precious minutes of my life staring at Croconaw, but what the fuck is with those two completely opposite facing teeth at the very back of its jaw? Seriously, what do those even fucking do?

Fuck me, I don't think I can do 142 more of these.

Dark Holy Elf

  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 8161
  • Well-behaved women seldom make history
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #166 on: February 08, 2016, 11:30:30 PM »
Good news, GSC doesn't have that many pokemon! You only have 91 to go, actually. You can do this!

Erwin Schrödinger will kill you like a cat in a box.
Maybe.

Grefter

  • Villain.
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 10386
  • True and Honest. Smarter. More aggressive.
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #167 on: February 09, 2016, 05:55:06 AM »

Okay now we can skip to gen 3 after 0/100 all of gen 2.
NO MORE POKEMON - Meeplelard.
The king perfect of the DL is and always will be Excal. - Superaielman
Don't worry, just jam it in anyway. - SirAlex
Gravellers are like, G-Unit - Trancey.

AndrewRogue

  • Infinite
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3079
  • Sadness
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #168 on: February 09, 2016, 07:57:51 AM »
Good news, GSC doesn't have that many pokemon! You only have 91 to go, actually. You can do this!

Did it? Thank God.

Sentret: First you draw an oval, then you FLEX, then you draw the rest of the Sentret. At some level, the design is kinda clever with the name and all. Then you remember it's stupid. 2/5

Furret: Why don't you have back legs? Why is your face pasted onto a tube? Give it a snout and some legs, and this thing is a solid 3/5. The color pattern and design is nice! As is, though? It's 2/5.

Hoothoot: Look at me, I'm a boring Pidgey color. I mean, I can sorta dig the one leg and the red eyes, but what's with the clock motif on the eyebrows and stuff? Also, the four talons kinds freak me out. 2/5

Noctowl: Generic owl is one of the better designs the game has to offer so far. The crest and brows are kinda cool, though. 3/5

Ledyba: Stupid face, stupid fists. 2/5

Ledian: You know what doesn't improve Ledyba's design? Giving it more humanoid characteristics. 2/5

Spinarak: The color scheme is kinda stupid and we have a nice return to form with the pointless, silly horn glued on, but otherwise, you know what? This is a decent spider pokemon (minus the missing legs). EDIT: Thanks for reminding me it had the sad face, Grefter. Frankly, that's worth some credit, I think. Spinarak knows what gen it's part of. 3/5

Ariados: Sigh. Color scheme is still stupid, we lose another set of legs to give it... back legs? And I'm kinda stick wondering how it's thorax doesn't drag on the ground at all times. EDIT: They don't even let you keep the thorax face. 2/5
« Last Edit: February 09, 2016, 08:05:52 AM by AndrewRogue »

Grefter

  • Villain.
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 10386
  • True and Honest. Smarter. More aggressive.
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #169 on: February 09, 2016, 08:02:23 AM »
Ledian has blowjob face.

Spinarak has :[ face.

Furret has a blowjob face and is built to deepthroat.
NO MORE POKEMON - Meeplelard.
The king perfect of the DL is and always will be Excal. - Superaielman
Don't worry, just jam it in anyway. - SirAlex
Gravellers are like, G-Unit - Trancey.

Captain K

  • Ugly Old Man
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1210
  • Saving the world with curry and coffee
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #170 on: February 09, 2016, 09:04:22 PM »
This is belated because, honestly, I really didn't want to waste precious minutes of my life staring at Croconaw, but what the fuck is with those two completely o

You also forgot to comment on Croconaw's Fred Flintstone caveman onesie.

Grefter

  • Villain.
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 10386
  • True and Honest. Smarter. More aggressive.
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #171 on: February 09, 2016, 09:24:17 PM »
Or how he is a member of the Ministry of Silly Walks.

Most pokedudes can't actually walk with their proportions.  Crocoshit is brave for proving it though.
NO MORE POKEMON - Meeplelard.
The king perfect of the DL is and always will be Excal. - Superaielman
Don't worry, just jam it in anyway. - SirAlex
Gravellers are like, G-Unit - Trancey.

DjinnAndTonic

  • Genie and Potion with Alcoholic Undertones
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6942
  • "When you wish upon a bar~"
    • View Profile
    • RPGDL Wiki
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #172 on: February 09, 2016, 11:09:32 PM »
Re: Furret
Have you ever actually seen a ferret in real life? They are practically legless. Honestly, the issue I'd have with Furret is that it is too much like its namesake to the point of not even being a new creature. ...and I think he's still the best design on this list. Jesus Christ, Gen 2. Hurry up and get to the legendaries.

Jo'ou Ranbu

  • Social Justice Steampunk Literature Character
  • New Age Retro Fucking Hipster
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 12988
  • Ah'm tuff fer mah size!
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #173 on: February 10, 2016, 12:47:19 AM »
Jesus Christ, Gen 2. Hurry up and get to Sudowoodo.
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> HEY
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> LAGGY
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> UVIET?!??!?!
[01:08] <Laggy> YA!!!!!!!!!1111111111
[01:08] <Soppy-ReturningToInaba> OMG!!!!
[01:08] <Chulianne> No wonder you're small.
[01:08] <TranceHime> cocks
[01:08] <Laggy> .....

AndrewRogue

  • Infinite
  • DL
  • Denizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3079
  • Sadness
    • View Profile
Re: An Aesthetic Discussion Spanning 17 Years - Andrew versus Pokemon
« Reply #174 on: February 10, 2016, 01:25:32 AM »


Featured: 300% more goddamn legs than Furret